H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Zi Yan H2H: 1-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Zi Yan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2006 US Open first round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 7-5 | Zi Yan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Agnieszka Radwanska | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |