H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 1-1
Ajla Tomljanovic and Agnieszka Radwanska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ajla Tomljanovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2015 Wimbledon second round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 6-2 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-4 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |