H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Nuria Parrizas Diaz
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Ajla Tomljanovic vs Nuria Parrizas Diaz.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 35
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nuria Parrizas Diaz | #323 | #45 | 1,190 | 1,744 | 40 | 61 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #125 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #216 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |