H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Varvara Lepchenko H2H: 0-2
Varvara Lepchenko holds a 2–0 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Varvara Lepchenko leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2015 Australian Open second round 6-1 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Varvara Lepchenko | 6-1 7-6(1) | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Varvara Lepchenko | 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Varvara Lepchenko | #172 | #19 | 1,875 | 1,804 | 155 | 220 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Varvara Lepchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #132 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #102 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #74 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #54 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #47 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #90 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #129 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #127 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |