H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexandra Dulgheru vs Lara Arruabarrena H2H: 0-1
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 1–0 lead over Alexandra Dulgheru in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2013 Seoul fourth round 6-1 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 37
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2013* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | Alexandra Dulgheru | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Dulgheru | #958 | #26 | 2,160 | 1,831 | 81 | 106 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandra Dulgheru | Lara Arruabarrena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #65 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #233 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,549 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |