H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 1-0
Aliaksandra Sasnovich holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aliaksandra Sasnovich won the 2019 Dubai second round 0-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2019* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 0-6 7-5 6-4 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |