H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-1
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Bucharest fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |