H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Mihaela Buzarnescu H2H: 2-0
Aliaksandra Sasnovich holds a 2–0 lead over Mihaela Buzarnescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aliaksandra Sasnovich won the 2018 Moscow third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2018* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-3 6-4 | Mihaela Buzarnescu | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2018 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-3 6-1 | Mihaela Buzarnescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,872 | 58 | 63 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #24 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #404 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |