H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Misaki Doi H2H: 1-0
Aliaksandra Sasnovich holds a 1–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aliaksandra Sasnovich won the 2016 Japan Women's Open third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2016* | Japan Women's Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 7-5 6-3 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Misaki Doi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |