H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Nao Hibino H2H: 1-1
Aliaksandra Sasnovich and Nao Hibino are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 1–0 on grass, while Nao Hibino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aliaksandra Sasnovich won the 2021 Wimbledon second round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-4 7-6(4) | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2015* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nao Hibino | (w/o) | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Nao Hibino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |