H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alison Van Uytvanck vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 1-0

Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Hradecka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2015 Linz Open first round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Van Uytvanck
Belgium Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Van Uytvanck #50 6-2 7-5 Lucie Hradecka #55 Match data Oct 15, 2015* R32 Linz Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alison Van Uytvanck #229 #37 1,355 1,772 123 149 45.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Lucie Hradecka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–2 33.3% #287 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 2–1 66.7% #199 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #112 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 10–17 37.0% #106 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2015 19–18 51.4% #44 1,647 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0
22 2016 4–13 23.5% #121 1,516 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0
23 2017 9–8 52.9% #76 1,634 0 1 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0
24 2018 19–22 46.3% #49 1,660 0 2 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0
25 2019 24–18 57.1% #47 1,736 0 4 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0
26 2020 7–11 38.9% #64 1,674 0 4 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0
27 2021 15–15 50.0% #58 1,772 0 5 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0
28 2022 9–13 40.9% #72 1,685 0 5 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0
29 2023 3–4 42.9% #344 1,687 0 5 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0
30 2024 0–4 0.0% #229 1,609 0 5 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Lucie Hradecka
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 6 11 17 35.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2016 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2017 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2018 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2023 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 85 90 175 48.6% 22 34 56 39.3% 16 25 41 39.0% — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's and 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Lucie Hradecka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 61.8% 66.5% 34.7% 49.3% 52.4% 54.4% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 4.3 2.0 59.4% 63.4% 49.6% 61.1% 31.4% 57.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 4/4 2.5 2.0 60.5% 56.2% 32.9% 46.0% 48.3% 50.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 27/27 2.8 1.9 60.8% 63.0% 51.0% 51.3% 46.0% 58.1% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 23/37 4.4 2.2 58.9% 64.4% 48.6% 53.1% 49.1% 57.9% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 17/17 4.3 3.5 56.8% 67.4% 44.6% 54.9% 47.7% 57.8% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 14/17 4.9 2.8 55.4% 69.1% 53.4% 64.4% 41.5% 62.4% 41.1% 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6%
24 2018 39/41 4.2 2.6 62.4% 65.5% 48.1% 61.6% 44.8% 59.2% 42.5% 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9%
25 2019 42/42 3.2 2.0 64.8% 63.0% 47.3% 55.8% 46.2% 57.4% 44.5% 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8%
26 2020 18/18 3.0 2.2 62.3% 66.6% 46.1% 47.0% 40.8% 58.7% 41.1% 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1%
27 2021 27/30 2.6 1.9 60.0% 63.1% 45.0% 54.3% 52.1% 56.0% 44.7% 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8%
28 2022 22/22 2.7 2.5 58.2% 64.6% 48.0% 60.7% 42.8% 57.8% 43.0% 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5%
29 2023 7/7 4.9 2.1 60.8% 65.7% 40.3% 59.0% 60.3% 55.8% 40.6% 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0%
30 2024 4/4 2.0 1.8 61.9% 50.4% 34.4% 43.3% 51.0% 44.3% 40.5% 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3%
Career — 250/272 3.5 2.3 60.8% 64.4% 47.1% 55.7% 46.4% 57.7% 41.8% — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Lucie Hradecka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1511 108.0 -2.51 -2.37 0.928 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–2 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1555 103.7 +2.11 -1.71 0.894 47.9% — +51 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1524 90.5 -1.68 -1.92 0.831 45.8% — — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1526 113.6 +1.00 -2.70 0.975 49.4% -8 +12 +42 43.3% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 92.5 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1647 123.7 +0.26 -3.01 0.870 47.5% -6 -88 -87 50.6% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 106.0 +0.57 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06
22 2016 1517 106.5 +0.03 -3.82 0.912 48.2% +32 — -45 36.6% -0.90 0–7 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 92.1 +0.27 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04
23 2017 1634 121.0 +2.65 -1.27 1.095 51.6% +11 -34 — 55.3% +0.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 +0.26 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
24 2018 1661 129.7 +1.86 -0.17 1.042 50.6% -23 -93 -60 46.9% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 97.5 -1.03 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41
25 2019 1736 130.4 +0.69 +0.82 1.044 50.9% -1 -93 -105 55.9% +0.33 9–4 (69%) 4–1 (80%) 107.5 +0.05 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10
26 2020 1674 126.9 +0.77 -1.27 0.995 49.6% +24 -57 — 46.3% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.2 +0.13 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58
27 2021 1772 134.7 -0.09 +1.01 1.015 50.6% +34 -271 -124 51.5% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -0.37 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15
28 2022 1685 128.7 +0.29 +0.04 1.018 50.4% -5 — +57 50.0% +0.19 0–8 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 86.9 +0.23 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39
29 2023 1687 120.1 -1.26 +0.60 0.919 48.7% -9 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.67 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33
30 2024 1609 96.6 -3.25 -1.92 0.727 42.6% — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — +0.23 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01
Career — 1772 129.8 +0.64 -0.86 0.987 49.7% +4 -70 -50 48.1% -0.02 39–53 (42%) 28–44 (39%) 92.0 +0.02 — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.