H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Alizé Cornet vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-3

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–0 lead over Alizé Cornet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2008 Moscow round of 32 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alizé Cornet
France Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #25 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 Alizé Cornet #19 Match data Oct 9, 2008* R32 Moscow Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #30 6-1 4-6 7-5 Alizé Cornet #17 Match data Jun 19, 2008* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-0 6-2 Alizé Cornet #645 Match data May 26, 2005* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 379 361 51.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alizé Cornet Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,509 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2008 36–22 62.1% #16 1,781 0 1 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,662 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,561 0 1 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2012 22–20 52.4% #44 1,640 0 2 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,791 0 4 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,631 0 4 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2016 22–21 51.2% #41 1,704 0 5 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2017 24–22 52.2% #38 1,754 0 5 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #45 1,689 0 6 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2019 24–20 54.5% #59 1,698 0 6 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,771 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2021 24–24 50.0% #61 1,744 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,752 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2023 12–18 40.0% #117 1,671 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,607 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,554 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alizé Cornet Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2007 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2009 12 13 25 48.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2011 7 8 15 46.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2013 17 15 32 53.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2014 28 16 44 63.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2015 16 18 34 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2019 13 11 24 54.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2020 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 16 15 31 51.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 16 16 32 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 217 208 425 51.1% 122 107 229 53.3% 33 38 71 46.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 665/741 of Alizé Cornet's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alizé Cornet Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2005 2/2 1.5 1.5 58.6% 56.3% 41.2% 45.0% 34.8% 49.8% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 3/3 1.3 6.7 58.0% 57.6% 45.5% 62.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 8/17 1.4 4.8 57.0% 61.7% 36.5% 46.8% 39.4% 50.8% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 48/58 2.4 3.1 59.4% 64.4% 43.4% 55.4% 56.2% 55.9% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 43/44 1.9 4.9 55.0% 59.8% 44.5% 47.9% 44.7% 52.9% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 32/37 2.3 3.6 60.6% 63.2% 40.3% 52.0% 47.3% 54.3% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 26/27 2.2 5.1 59.0% 59.3% 40.6% 51.5% 55.2% 51.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 36/42 1.2 4.7 61.0% 60.7% 40.8% 49.1% 53.9% 52.8% 48.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 51/62 2.1 4.7 60.5% 61.5% 44.5% 54.0% 52.2% 54.8% 47.0% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2014 52/61 1.5 5.0 62.9% 63.4% 45.2% 49.6% 51.5% 56.5% 47.0% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2015 42/49 1.8 5.9 65.7% 62.3% 48.9% 48.9% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2016 35/43 1.5 5.5 63.1% 62.7% 41.0% 58.8% 51.0% 54.5% 44.7% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2017 41/46 1.0 4.3 64.3% 59.3% 41.1% 52.6% 51.7% 52.9% 47.4% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2018 45/47 1.2 3.6 65.2% 60.9% 45.3% 52.0% 50.6% 55.5% 44.7% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2019 44/44 1.5 3.2 63.1% 63.5% 46.3% 51.5% 50.0% 57.1% 47.8% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2020 22/22 2.2 4.7 62.6% 66.3% 42.6% 56.0% 51.4% 57.5% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 47/49 1.6 4.5 63.0% 62.7% 42.0% 52.0% 51.8% 54.8% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 49/49 2.2 4.6 58.7% 65.5% 45.2% 51.7% 48.8% 57.2% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 30/30 1.5 5.3 63.6% 61.9% 42.7% 52.0% 54.8% 54.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 8/8 1.4 5.6 58.6% 57.6% 36.6% 52.0% 36.2% 48.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 0.0 5.0 50.9% 51.9% 23.1% 0.0% 16.7% 37.7% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 665/741 1.7 4.5 61.6% 62.2% 43.5% 51.9% 50.9% 55.0% 45.7% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alizé Cornet Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1516 106.6 -1.79 +1.78 0.836 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 1–0 — -0.03 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 2006 1510 102.3 -1.61 -2.20 0.893 47.7% — — — 37.5% -0.87 1–1 — — +0.29 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2007 1570 120.8 -1.99 +1.24 0.957 48.9% -48 +43 — 48.7% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.22 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2008 1782 146.7 +0.62 +3.01 1.067 51.6% -112 +74 — 59.5% +0.78 11–8 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.5 -0.33 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2009 1663 128.7 -2.23 +1.23 0.955 49.3% +16 +59 — 45.1% -0.31 8–6 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.18 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2010 1611 121.0 -1.21 +1.16 1.003 50.1% +7 +76 — 48.8% +0.02 4–8 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.69 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2011 1562 123.0 -3.16 +0.65 0.933 48.4% +57 +60 — 39.3% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 -1.01 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2012 1640 126.5 -2.48 +2.74 1.023 50.5% -34 +105 -109 50.0% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 108.0 +0.06 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2013 1731 137.4 -0.53 +2.45 1.040 51.0% -10 +13 -220 54.9% +0.32 12–10 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.1 +0.65 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2014 1792 145.4 +0.93 +3.61 1.080 51.7% +29 -135 -154 54.2% +0.46 17–9 (65%) 8–12 (40%) 104.0 -0.76 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2015 1631 126.7 -0.36 +1.69 1.041 50.7% +22 +52 -29 47.9% -0.03 10–11 (48%) 1–7 (13%) 91.6 +1.81 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2016 1704 131.6 -0.75 +1.42 0.982 49.8% +19 -93 -99 48.9% +0.14 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.07 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2017 1755 137.4 -2.79 +3.62 1.006 50.0% +35 -111 -216 51.0% +0.11 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.01 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2018 1689 134.8 -1.25 +1.50 1.004 50.1% -15 +85 -137 48.1% -0.04 6–8 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.03 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2019 1699 130.0 +0.27 +3.19 1.115 52.5% -21 +47 -95 56.7% +0.59 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +1.36 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
30 2020 1771 138.5 +0.58 +1.50 1.044 51.5% +8 -35 — 55.3% +0.64 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 103.6 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1744 132.4 -0.78 +2.82 1.016 50.4% +5 -128 -57 48.1% +0.06 10–4 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 106.9 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1753 141.3 +0.38 +1.27 1.028 50.7% -22 -126 +32 55.3% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1671 113.6 -1.47 -0.64 0.957 49.0% -36 -30 +86 39.4% -0.37 7–4 (64%) 2–7 (22%) 98.9 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1607 107.6 -3.28 -1.77 0.763 44.3% -37 +7 — 16.7% -2.50 1–1 — — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1554 97.7 +1.43 +0.15 0.615 38.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1884 138.4 -0.83 +2.02 1.016 50.4% -1 +21 -65 50.3% +0.12 127–114 (53%) 74–76 (49%) 101.7 0.00 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.