H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:30 UTC
Alizé Cornet vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 1-2
Ana Ivanovic holds a 2–1 lead over Alizé Cornet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2014 Rome third round 7-6(1) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 36
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2014* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 7-6(1) 7-5 | Alizé Cornet | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2013* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alizé Cornet | 2-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2008* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-1 7-6(1) | Alizé Cornet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alizé Cornet | #460 | #11 | 3,256 | 1,884 | 376 | 358 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alizé Cornet | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2007 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2008 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #16 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2009 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2011 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #88 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #44 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | 2013 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2014 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #19 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2015 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #43 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,702 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2017 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #38 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 |
| 29 | 2019 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #59 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #61 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #117 | 1,684 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #391 | 1,613 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,558 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |