H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Alizé Cornet vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 4-3

Alizé Cornet holds a 4–3 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Alizé Cornet leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2014 US Open second round 6-3 6-3.

FRA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Alizé Cornet #23 6-3 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #37 Match data
Apr 30, 2009* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #39 6-3 6-1 Alizé Cornet #15 Match data
Feb 13, 2009* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Alizé Cornet #13 1-6 6-4 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #39 Match data
Jan 24, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Alizé Cornet #16 4-6 6-4 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #21 Match data
Aug 23, 2008* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Alizé Cornet #18 3-6 6-4 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #12 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #9 6-2 7-5 Alizé Cornet #59 Match data
Jan 17, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #18 6-4 6-1 Alizé Cornet #192 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 376 358 51.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alizé Cornet Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
16 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,510 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 2008 34–21 61.8% #16 1,775 0 1 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,660 0 1 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1
21 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,560 0 1 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1
22 2012 21–19 52.5% #44 1,637 0 2 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1
23 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1
24 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,789 0 4 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3
25 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,632 0 4 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3
26 2016 20–19 51.3% #41 1,702 0 5 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3
27 2017 23–22 51.1% #38 1,750 0 5 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3
28 2018 22–23 48.9% #45 1,693 0 6 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4
29 2019 25–22 53.2% #59 1,683 0 6 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5
30 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,763 0 6 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2021 24–23 51.1% #61 1,744 0 6 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,755 0 6 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2023 15–19 44.1% #117 1,684 0 6 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,613 0 6 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,558 0 6