H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Alizé Cornet vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 2-0

Alizé Cornet holds a 2–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alizé Cornet leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2013 Australian Open round of 128 7-5 6-7(3) 10-8.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alizé Cornet
France Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alizé Cornet #41 7-5 6-7(3) 10-8 Marina Erakovic #68 Match data Jan 16, 2013* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Alizé Cornet #49 6-4 6-3 Marina Erakovic #227 Match data Jan 6, 2010* R32 ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 379 361 51.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alizé Cornet Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2008 36–22 62.1% #16 1,781 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,662 0 1 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,561 0 1 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2012 22–20 52.4% #44 1,640 0 2 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,791 0 4 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,631 0 4 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1
26 2016 22–21 51.2% #41 1,704 0 5 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2017 24–22 52.2% #38 1,754 0 5 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #45 1,689 0 6 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2019 24–20 54.5% #59 1,698 0 6 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,771 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2021 24–24 50.0% #61 1,744 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,752 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2023 12–18 40.0% #117 1,671 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,607 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,554 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alizé Cornet Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 12 13 25 48.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 2011 7 8 15 46.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2013 17 15 32 53.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2014 28 16 44 63.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2015 16 18 34 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2019 13 11 24 54.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2020 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 16 15 31 51.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 16 16 32 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 217 208 425 51.1% 122 107 229 53.3% 33 38 71 46.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 665/741 of Alizé Cornet's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alizé Cornet Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2005 2/2 1.5 1.5 58.6% 56.3% 41.2% 45.0% 34.8% 49.8% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 3/3 1.3 6.7 58.0% 57.6% 45.5% 62.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 8/17 1.4 4.8 57.0% 61.7% 36.5% 46.8% 39.4% 50.8% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 48/58 2.4 3.1 59.4% 64.4% 43.4% 55.4% 56.2% 55.9% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 43/44 1.9 4.9 55.0% 59.8% 44.5% 47.9% 44.7% 52.9% 45.0% 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 2010 32/37 2.3 3.6 60.6% 63.2% 40.3% 52.0% 47.3% 54.3% 45.9% 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 2011 26/27 2.2 5.1 59.0% 59.3% 40.6% 51.5% 55.2% 51.6% 45.2% 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2012 36/42 1.2 4.7 61.0% 60.7% 40.8% 49.1% 53.9% 52.8% 48.2% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2013 51/62 2.1 4.7 60.5% 61.5% 44.5% 54.0% 52.2% 54.8% 47.0% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2014 52/61 1.5 5.0 62.9% 63.4% 45.2% 49.6% 51.5% 56.5% 47.0% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2015 42/49 1.8 5.9 65.7% 62.3% 48.9% 48.9% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2016 35/43 1.5 5.5 63.1% 62.7% 41.0% 58.8% 51.0% 54.5% 44.7% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2017 41/46 1.0 4.3 64.3% 59.3% 41.1% 52.6% 51.7% 52.9% 47.4% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2018 45/47 1.2 3.6 65.2% 60.9% 45.3% 52.0% 50.6% 55.5% 44.7% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2019 44/44 1.5 3.2 63.1% 63.5% 46.3% 51.5% 50.0% 57.1% 47.8% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2020 22/22 2.2 4.7 62.6% 66.3% 42.6% 56.0% 51.4% 57.5% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 47/49 1.6 4.5 63.0% 62.7% 42.0% 52.0% 51.8% 54.8% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 49/49 2.2 4.6 58.7% 65.5% 45.2% 51.7% 48.8% 57.2% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 30/30 1.5 5.3 63.6% 61.9% 42.7% 52.0% 54.8% 54.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 8/8 1.4 5.6 58.6% 57.6% 36.6% 52.0% 36.2% 48.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 0.0 5.0 50.9% 51.9% 23.1% 0.0% 16.7% 37.7% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 665/741 1.7 4.5 61.6% 62.2% 43.5% 51.9% 50.9% 55.0% 45.7% — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alizé Cornet Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1516 106.6 -1.79 +1.78 0.836 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 1–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1510 102.3 -1.61 -2.20 0.893 47.7% — — — 37.5% -0.87 1–1 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1570 120.8 -1.99 +1.24 0.957 48.9% -48 +43 — 48.7% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.22 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
18 2008 1782 146.7 +0.62 +3.01 1.067 51.6% -112 +74 — 59.5% +0.78 11–8 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.5 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1663 128.7 -2.23 +1.23 0.955 49.3% +16 +59 — 45.1% -0.31 8–6 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.18 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.10
20 2010 1611 121.0 -1.21 +1.16 1.003 50.1% +7 +76 — 48.8% +0.02 4–8 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.69 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2011 1562 123.0 -3.16 +0.65 0.933 48.4% +57 +60 — 39.3% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 -1.01 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 2012 1640 126.5 -2.48 +2.74 1.023 50.5% -34 +105 -109 50.0% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 108.0 +0.06 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 — +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 2013 1731 137.4 -0.53 +2.45 1.040 51.0% -10 +13 -220 54.9% +0.32 12–10 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.1 +0.65 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.24
24 2014 1792 145.4 +0.93 +3.61 1.080 51.7% +29 -135 -154 54.2% +0.46 17–9 (65%) 8–12 (40%) 104.0 -0.76 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2015 1631 126.7 -0.36 +1.69 1.041 50.7% +22 +52 -29 47.9% -0.03 10–11 (48%) 1–7 (13%) 91.6 +1.81 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2016 1704 131.6 -0.75 +1.42 0.982 49.8% +19 -93 -99 48.9% +0.14 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.07 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2017 1755 137.4 -2.79 +3.62 1.006 50.0% +35 -111 -216 51.0% +0.11 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.01 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2018 1689 134.8 -1.25 +1.50 1.004 50.1% -15 +85 -137 48.1% -0.04 6–8 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.03 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2019 1699 130.0 +0.27 +3.19 1.115 52.5% -21 +47 -95 56.7% +0.59 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +1.36 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2020 1771 138.5 +0.58 +1.50 1.044 51.5% +8 -35 — 55.3% +0.64 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 103.6 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1744 132.4 -0.78 +2.82 1.016 50.4% +5 -128 -57 48.1% +0.06 10–4 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 106.9 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1753 141.3 +0.38 +1.27 1.028 50.7% -22 -126 +32 55.3% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1671 113.6 -1.47 -0.64 0.957 49.0% -36 -30 +86 39.4% -0.37 7–4 (64%) 2–7 (22%) 98.9 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1607 107.6 -3.28 -1.77 0.763 44.3% -37 +7 — 16.7% -2.50 1–1 — — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1554 97.7 +1.43 +0.15 0.615 38.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1884 138.4 -0.83 +2.02 1.016 50.4% -1 +21 -65 50.3% +0.12 127–114 (53%) 74–76 (49%) 101.7 0.00 — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.