H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Alizé Cornet vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 1-1
Alizé Cornet and Nadia Petrova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on clay, while Alizé Cornet leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2011 Strasbourg fourth round 2-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 36
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2011* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Nadia Petrova | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | Alizé Cornet | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2009* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alizé Cornet | 6-2 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alizé Cornet | #460 | #11 | 3,256 | 1,884 | 376 | 358 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alizé Cornet | Nadia Petrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2007 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #16 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #88 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #44 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #19 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2015 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #43 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,702 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2017 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #38 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2019 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #59 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2021 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #61 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2022 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #117 | 1,684 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #391 | 1,613 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,558 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |