H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Alizé Cornet vs Serena Williams H2H: 4-2

Alizé Cornet holds a 4–2 lead over Serena Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Alizé Cornet leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2014 Wuhan third round 5-6 RET.

FRA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 2014* Wuhan WTA 1000 R32 Hard Alizé Cornet #21 5-6 (ret.) Serena Williams #1 Match data
Jun 29, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Alizé Cornet #24 1-6 6-3 6-4 Serena Williams #1 Match data
Feb 22, 2014* Dubai WTA 500 SF Hard Alizé Cornet #26 6-4 6-4 Serena Williams #1 Match data
Jan 4, 2013* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Serena Williams #3 6-2 6-2 Alizé Cornet #44 Match data
May 17, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Alizé Cornet #34 (w/o) Serena Williams #6 Match data
Apr 19, 2008* Charleston WTA 1000 SF Clay Serena Williams #9 7-5 6-3 Alizé Cornet #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 376 358 51.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alizé Cornet Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,510 0 0 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2008 34–21 61.8% #16 1,775 0 1 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,660 0 1 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,560 0 1 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2012 21–19 52.5% #44 1,637 0 2 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,789 0 4 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,632 0 4 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2016 20–19 51.3% #41 1,702 0 5 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2017 23–22 51.1% #38 1,750 0 5 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2018 22–23 48.9% #45 1,693 0 6 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2019 25–22 53.2% #59 1,683 0 6 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,763 0 6 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2021 24–23 51.1% #61 1,744 0 6 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,755 0 6 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2023 15–19 44.1% #117 1,684 0 6 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,613 0 6 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,558 0 6 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 23 71