Alycia Parks
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Shnaider | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Leylah Fernandez | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Qinwen Zheng | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 20, 2023 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Alycia Parks vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-1
Rebecca Peterson holds a 1–0 lead over Alycia Parks in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2023 Mérida Open second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Peterson | 6-4 6-2 | Alycia Parks | Match data | Feb 24, 2023* | R16 | Mérida Open | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alycia Parks | #79 | #40 | 1,208 | 1,815 | 55 | 81 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,861 | 80 | 95 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alycia Parks | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #85 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #82 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #44 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #78 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #79 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Alycia Parks | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2017 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2023 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2018 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2024 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2019 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 2025 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 43.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2020 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2021 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 39 | 53 | 92 | 42.4% | 13 | 20 | 33 | 39.4% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | 58 | 51 | 109 | 53.2% | 18 | 34 | 52 | 34.6% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 118/136 of Alycia Parks's and 168/174 of Rebecca Peterson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Alycia Parks | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 64.3% | 41.7% | 40.0% | 45.5% | 66.7% | 41.1% | 42.2% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 64.5% | 51.3% | 36.8% | 49.5% | 42.5% | 46.3% | 44.1% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5/7 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 70.0% | 57.3% | 48.6% | 36.8% | 50.3% | 55.0% | 41.0% |
| 20 | 2021 | 6/6 | 7.8 | 7.5 | 50.2% | 65.6% | 39.1% | 49.3% | 33.3% | 52.6% | 39.9% | 2016 | 9/9 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 68.4% | 61.4% | 41.7% | 48.7% | 51.7% | 55.4% | 40.7% |
| 21 | 2022 | 6/6 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 59.0% | 63.9% | 44.9% | 55.0% | 56.7% | 56.4% | 39.1% | 2017 | 5/5 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 64.2% | 63.6% | 48.6% | 73.1% | 59.8% | 58.0% | 42.1% |
| 22 | 2023 | 34/34 | 7.9 | 9.1 | 53.0% | 69.3% | 42.6% | 53.1% | 44.1% | 56.4% | 38.1% | 2018 | 21/21 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 63.7% | 62.9% | 41.3% | 57.6% | 50.4% | 55.0% | 43.1% |
| 23 | 2024 | 14/14 | 4.9 | 8.8 | 51.7% | 64.6% | 38.1% | 43.8% | 34.9% | 51.8% | 38.0% | 2019 | 42/43 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 67.1% | 61.9% | 50.4% | 57.2% | 44.5% | 58.0% | 43.3% |
| 24 | 2025 | 21/38 | 5.2 | 8.0 | 53.7% | 65.0% | 39.9% | 50.9% | 37.0% | 53.4% | 36.7% | 2020 | 13/13 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 66.5% | 55.9% | 44.5% | 36.8% | 30.4% | 51.8% | 39.5% |
| 25 | 2026 | 37/38 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 54.2% | 68.5% | 43.3% | 52.0% | 47.1% | 56.9% | 40.1% | 2021 | 34/36 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 65.5% | 62.2% | 47.7% | 52.4% | 47.4% | 57.1% | 41.3% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20/21 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 63.7% | 61.1% | 42.5% | 45.1% | 45.0% | 54.0% | 39.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15/15 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 65.3% | 64.3% | 40.5% | 53.5% | 51.5% | 55.9% | 45.3% |
| Career | — | 118/136 | 6.3 | 7.7 | 53.5% | 67.3% | 41.7% | 51.2% | 42.8% | 55.3% | 38.6% | — | 168/175 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 65.7% | 61.3% | 45.5% | 52.1% | 46.5% | 55.8% | 42.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Alycia Parks | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1488 | 95.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1485 | 102.5 | +3.18 | +1.91 | 0.716 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.28 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1490 | 101.8 | -1.67 | +0.24 | 0.821 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1505 | 104.6 | -0.71 | -1.19 | 0.911 | 47.7% | — | -1 | — | 37.5% | -1.06 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 20 | 2021 | 1494 | 104.8 | -1.89 | -1.34 | 0.841 | 46.0% | — | +103 | — | 35.7% | -1.29 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 2016 | 1506 | 107.2 | -0.91 | -1.94 | 0.911 | 48.2% | +59 | -42 | — | 42.1% | -0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.28 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1735 | 115.5 | +0.46 | +0.89 | 0.896 | 48.2% | -17 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.31 | 1–0 | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.30 | 2017 | 1550 | 106.4 | +0.60 | -1.14 | 1.003 | 50.3% | +49 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 22 | 2023 | 1660 | 125.8 | +0.06 | -3.71 | 0.875 | 47.4% | +26 | -90 | -67 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–4 (60%) | 99.3 | -0.98 | 2018 | 1693 | 125.9 | -0.84 | -0.13 | 0.960 | 49.2% | +26 | -250 | -63 | 46.7% | -0.22 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.29 |
| 23 | 2024 | 1670 | 107.3 | -2.42 | -3.22 | 0.788 | 45.2% | +20 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.50 | 2–2 (50%) | — | — | -0.06 | 2019 | 1862 | 140.3 | +1.54 | +0.91 | 1.032 | 50.8% | -2 | -323 | -222 | 53.6% | +0.22 | 11–6 (65%) | 5–5 (50%) | 106.5 | -2.59 |
| 24 | 2025 | 1615 | 133.0 | -2.00 | -3.95 | 0.787 | 45.3% | +41 | -189 | — | 41.4% | -0.69 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–5 (38%) | 99.2 | -0.43 | 2020 | 1698 | 103.7 | -2.62 | -2.51 | 0.819 | 45.3% | +41 | -190 | — | 20.8% | -2.08 | 1–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.28 |
| 25 | 2026 | 1647 | 128.2 | -0.08 | -2.37 | 0.929 | 48.6% | +44 | -64 | — | 47.8% | -0.49 | 7–7 (50%) | 5–3 (63%) | 103.0 | +1.96 | 2021 | 1700 | 129.0 | +0.81 | -0.92 | 0.963 | 49.2% | +11 | -79 | — | 49.4% | -0.04 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.0 | -0.71 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1659 | 117.2 | -1.27 | -2.53 | 0.866 | 47.2% | +49 | -54 | — | 33.3% | -0.89 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.50 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1647 | 126.0 | -0.31 | +1.31 | 1.028 | 50.7% | +73 | -62 | — | 48.5% | +0.12 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–4 (0%) | 97.8 | -0.35 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1645 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1816 | 125.9 | -0.72 | -2.92 | 0.863 | 47.1% | +34 | -79 | -67 | 42.1% | -0.74 | 21–23 (48%) | 16–14 (53%) | 103.1 | +0.16 | — | 1862 | 129.7 | 0.00 | -0.51 | 0.952 | 49.0% | +25 | -149 | -151 | 44.3% | -0.36 | 28–25 (53%) | 18–28 (39%) | 101.5 | -2.22 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Rebecca Peterson
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 22, 2022 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 26, 2023 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 25, 2023 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |