H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alycia Parks vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 1-0

Alycia Parks holds a 1–0 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alycia Parks leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alycia Parks won the 2023 Madrid Open second round 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alycia Parks
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alycia Parks #54 6-2 7-6(5) Victoria Azarenka #16 Match data Apr 28, 2023* R64 Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alycia Parks #79 #40 1,208 1,815 55 81 40.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alycia Parks Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3
20 2021 2–4 33.3% #214 1,494 0 0 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5
21 2022 3–3 50.0% #75 1,734 0 0 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8
22 2023 13–21 38.2% #85 1,660 0 1 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14
23 2024 4–10 28.6% #82 1,670 0 1 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17
24 2025 15–23 39.5% #78 1,614 0 1 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17
25 2026 18–20 47.4% #79 1,646 0 1 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17
26 — — — — — — — 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20
27 — — — — — — — 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20
28 — — — — — — — 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20
29 — — — — — — — 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20
30 — — — — — — — 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21
31 — — — — — — — 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21
32 — — — — — — — 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21
33 — — — — — — — 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21
34 — — — — — — — 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21
35 — — — — — — — 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alycia Parks Victoria Azarenka
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
20 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
21 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
22 2023 8 12 20 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — —
23 2024 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2025 13 17 30 43.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2026 12 13 25 48.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 39 53 92 42.4% 13 20 33 39.4% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 118/136 of Alycia Parks's and 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alycia Parks Victoria Azarenka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5%
20 2021 6/6 7.8 7.5 50.2% 65.6% 39.1% 49.3% 33.3% 52.6% 39.9% 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1%
21 2022 6/6 7.0 7.5 59.0% 63.9% 44.9% 55.0% 56.7% 56.4% 39.1% 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6%
22 2023 34/34 7.9 9.1 53.0% 69.3% 42.6% 53.1% 44.1% 56.4% 38.1% 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6%
23 2024 14/14 4.9 8.8 51.7% 64.6% 38.1% 43.8% 34.9% 51.8% 38.0% 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1%
24 2025 21/38 5.2 8.0 53.7% 65.0% 39.9% 50.9% 37.0% 53.4% 36.7% 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7%
25 2026 37/38 5.6 6.1 54.2% 68.5% 43.3% 52.0% 47.1% 56.9% 40.1% 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1%
Career — 118/136 6.3 7.7 53.5% 67.3% 41.7% 51.2% 42.8% 55.3% 38.6% — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alycia Parks Victoria Azarenka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25
20 2021 1494 104.8 -1.89 -1.34 0.841 46.0% — +103 — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.03 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88
21 2022 1735 115.5 +0.46 +0.89 0.896 48.2% -17 — — 46.2% -0.31 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.30 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87
22 2023 1660 125.8 +0.06 -3.71 0.875 47.4% +26 -90 -67 41.3% -0.73 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.3 -0.98 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63
23 2024 1670 107.3 -2.42 -3.22 0.788 45.2% +20 — — 31.3% -1.50 2–2 (50%) — — -0.06 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19
24 2025 1615 133.0 -2.00 -3.95 0.787 45.3% +41 -189 — 41.4% -0.69 5–6 (45%) 3–5 (38%) 99.2 -0.43 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19
25 2026 1647 128.2 -0.08 -2.37 0.929 48.6% +44 -64 — 47.8% -0.49 7–7 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 103.0 +1.96 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03
Career — 1816 125.9 -0.72 -2.92 0.863 47.1% +34 -79 -67 42.1% -0.74 21–23 (48%) 16–14 (53%) 103.1 +0.16 — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.