H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jil Teichmann holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2020 Strasbourg Open first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data | Jan 8, 2023 | Q2 | Adelaide 2 | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Jil Teichmann | 6-2 6-3 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data | Sep 23, 2020* | R32 | Strasbourg Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #10 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,125 | 179 | 107 | 62.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Jil Teichmann | #175 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 94 | 104 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #24 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,892 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,114 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2026 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #10 | 2,011 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #175 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2024 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 73.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 112 | 70 | 182 | 61.5% | 41 | 25 | 66 | 62.1% | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | — | 50 | 61 | 111 | 45.0% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2017 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 56.5% | 58.9% | 38.9% | 56.1% | 46.1% | 50.4% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 16/17 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 67.0% | 66.6% | 51.5% | 59.8% | 49.3% | 61.5% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 35/36 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 65.4% | 63.1% | 48.2% | 61.3% | 48.8% | 57.6% | 47.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20/21 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 66.6% | 60.7% | 45.3% | 46.4% | 44.0% | 55.2% | 43.6% | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% |
| 19 | 2021 | 29/29 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 66.0% | 65.3% | 47.5% | 50.6% | 54.4% | 59.4% | 46.2% | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% |
| 20 | 2022 | 44/47 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 65.6% | 66.5% | 48.7% | 52.8% | 50.6% | 60.3% | 44.5% | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% |
| 21 | 2023 | 9/9 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 65.2% | 61.7% | 44.6% | 47.8% | 42.5% | 55.7% | 40.9% | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% |
| 22 | 2024 | 28/29 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 61.6% | 61.3% | 49.1% | 55.4% | 53.8% | 56.5% | 44.0% | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2025 | 44/64 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 63.1% | 67.4% | 49.9% | 56.3% | 47.4% | 61.1% | 44.5% | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2026 | 31/36 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 64.0% | 68.9% | 50.4% | 47.4% | 54.2% | 62.3% | 47.2% | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 67.7% | 58.6% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 47.9% | 56.0% | 45.9% |
| Career | — | 258/290 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 64.6% | 65.1% | 48.7% | 53.7% | 50.1% | 59.2% | 45.3% | — | 184/198 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 60.9% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.8% | 46.6% | 56.5% | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2017 | 1483 | 101.2 | -0.25 | -2.07 | 0.921 | 48.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 1683 | 142.2 | +4.05 | +2.84 | 1.199 | 54.1% | +12 | — | — | 68.6% | +1.34 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 1765 | 138.6 | +0.98 | +4.05 | 1.126 | 52.6% | -48 | -32 | -110 | 63.0% | +0.84 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–1 (86%) | 104.3 | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 1778 | 138.0 | -0.33 | +0.69 | 0.973 | 49.5% | -19 | -30 | — | 55.6% | +0.18 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.4 | -0.42 | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | 2021 | 1780 | 139.7 | +2.46 | +2.91 | 1.136 | 52.6% | +8 | -45 | -146 | 51.5% | +0.55 | 2–8 (20%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.9 | -1.37 | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 20 | 2022 | 1927 | 151.1 | +2.94 | +2.37 | 1.120 | 52.3% | -73 | -6 | -126 | 65.1% | +0.87 | 13–5 (72%) | 5–2 (71%) | 110.1 | -2.09 | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1794 | 127.1 | -0.58 | -0.40 | 0.923 | 48.2% | -29 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.26 | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -95 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1892 | 146.4 | +0.57 | +1.45 | 1.010 | 50.3% | +36 | -108 | — | 62.3% | +0.41 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.8 | -1.57 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +83 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2025 | 2115 | 162.2 | +3.85 | +2.19 | 1.142 | 52.6% | +10 | -238 | -59 | 66.7% | +1.09 | 15–4 (79%) | 9–5 (64%) | 113.5 | -0.29 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 |
| 24 | 2026 | 2012 | 157.7 | +4.35 | +4.19 | 1.250 | 54.7% | +43 | -142 | +2 | 60.8% | +1.05 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.9 | +1.28 | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +76 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1648 | 117.6 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +30 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.29 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1708 | 124.4 | +0.10 | +2.08 | 1.042 | 51.0% | — | +59 | — | 70.6% | +0.94 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.30 |
| Career | — | 2126 | 156.9 | +2.36 | +2.51 | 1.111 | 52.2% | -1 | -68 | -83 | 61.2% | +0.77 | 49–44 (53%) | 32–25 (56%) | 106.2 | -1.30 | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.29 | +0.25 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +5 | +91 | -158 | 49.2% | -0.12 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 5 | 11 | Nov 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Feb 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Belinda Bencic | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |