H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Leylah Fernandez H2H: 1-2
Leylah Fernandez holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Leylah Fernandez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 Doha fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2025 | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-3 6-0 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| May 31, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Leylah Fernandez | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 2-6 7-6(0) | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |