H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Paula Badosa H2H: 2-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–0 lead over Paula Badosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 Doha third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2025 | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-4 6-3 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 7-5 6-4 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Paula Badosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 |