H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Qinwen Zheng H2H: 1-2
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 Queens semifinal 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2025 | Queens | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Amanda Anisimova | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2024* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |