H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 1-0
Ana Bogdan holds a 1–0 lead over Ana Konjuh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Bogdan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Bogdan won the 2022 Istanbul third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2022* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ana Bogdan | 6-4 6-3 | Ana Konjuh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |