H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Christina Mchale H2H: 0-1
Christina Mchale holds a 1–0 lead over Ana Bogdan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Christina Mchale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Christina Mchale won the 2018 Guangzhou third round 4-6 6-3 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 4-6 6-3 3-1 (ret.) | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |