H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 1-1
Ana Bogdan and Ekaterina Makarova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2018 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2018* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-3 6-2 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2018 | Washington DC | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |