H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 0-3
Monica Niculescu holds a 3–0 lead over Ana Bogdan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Monica Niculescu leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Niculescu won the 2017 US Open second round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2018 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 6-2 7-6(8) | Monica Niculescu | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Monica Niculescu | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Monica Niculescu | 6-0 6-1 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2015* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Monica Niculescu | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Monica Niculescu | #958 | #28 | 1,960 | 1,807 | 176 | 213 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Monica Niculescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #48 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #103 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #58 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #77 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #118 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |