H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 2-2
Ana Ivanovic and Timea Bacsinszky are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2016 Miami third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 7-5 6-4 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2015* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2014* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-1 6-2 | Timea Bacsinszky | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2010* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Timea Bacsinszky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Timea Bacsinszky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |