H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ana Konjuh vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 1-0
Ana Konjuh holds a 1–0 lead over Richel Hogenkamp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2017 S-Hertogenbosch fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Ana Konjuh | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Richel Hogenkamp | #1,297 | #94 | 654 | 1,579 | 14 | 28 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Konjuh | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #132 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #106 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |