H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Jamie Hampton H2H: 0-1

Jamie Hampton holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jamie Hampton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jamie Hampton won the 2013 Cincinnati Open round of 64 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Russia Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jamie Hampton
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jamie Hampton #26 7-5 4-6 6-3 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #30 Match data Aug 14, 2013* R64 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #445 #11 3,590 1,944 422 328 56.3% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Jamie Hampton #323 #24 2,036 1,802 42 40 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Jamie Hampton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,702 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,824 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,813 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,712 0 3 2010 0–3 0.0% #133 1,479 0 0
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,798 0 5 2011 1–9 10.0% #144 1,416 0 0
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,764 0 7 2012 12–12 50.0% #70 1,593 0 0
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,868 0 8 2013 26–15 63.4% #28 1,767 0 0
24 2016 26–25 51.0% #27 1,749 0 8 2014 3–1 75.0% #323 1,786 0 0
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 — — — — — — —
26 2018 21–21 50.0% #42 1,806 0 12 — — — — — — —
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,797 0 12 — — — — — — —
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,802 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 2021 27–19 58.7% #11 1,835 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,793 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,846 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,811 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #445 1,727 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Jamie Hampton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 31 14 45 68.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 26 15 41 63.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 26 16 42 61.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% 2012 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 29 14 43 67.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 15 9 24 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
24 2016 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 31 17 48 64.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 15 14 29 51.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 6 8 14 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 21 13 34 61.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 298 220 518 57.5% 90 74 164 54.9% 27 30 57 47.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — 29 28 57 50.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 675/751 of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's and 76/82 of Jamie Hampton's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Jamie Hampton
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.9% 63.0% 41.7% 42.9% 50.0% 52.9% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% — 27.8% 14.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 14/18 1.9 3.1 57.9% 64.6% 45.1% 37.4% 48.4% 56.5% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 43/44 2.0 5.1 58.9% 64.8% 43.9% 52.3% 46.7% 56.0% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 54/60 2.6 5.3 59.2% 64.8% 45.4% 54.3% 46.6% 56.8% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 55/58 3.0 6.1 60.1% 67.0% 46.1% 50.9% 53.5% 58.3% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 40/44 2.4 5.6 59.2% 64.5% 41.9% 50.5% 46.8% 55.0% 42.7% 2010 3/3 2.7 3.7 55.7% 60.7% 36.5% 31.5% 44.4% 49.4% 35.8%
21 2013 47/55 2.9 5.4 56.6% 68.7% 46.2% 52.4% 48.3% 59.1% 44.5% 2011 9/10 1.9 5.2 52.3% 58.7% 40.8% 40.5% 50.7% 49.7% 40.0%
22 2014 38/46 3.9 7.4 56.4% 69.2% 39.6% 55.3% 52.4% 56.4% 42.7% 2012 23/24 2.6 3.6 55.0% 64.3% 47.0% 52.0% 42.2% 56.4% 42.8%
23 2015 38/55 2.3 5.4 65.0% 65.0% 49.8% 53.2% 46.1% 59.4% 40.5% 2013 38/41 3.1 3.7 58.1% 66.2% 47.0% 52.3% 44.8% 58.1% 45.1%
24 2016 42/51 2.8 4.0 62.7% 65.6% 43.7% 49.9% 53.7% 57.3% 45.0% 2014 3/4 4.0 4.0 56.7% 71.7% 48.5% 45.6% 63.2% 61.6% 47.8%
25 2017 64/64 3.0 4.5 62.3% 65.3% 46.2% 57.3% 45.7% 58.2% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 40/42 2.6 4.3 65.0% 66.1% 43.9% 53.5% 44.9% 58.5% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 43/43 2.3 4.7 62.3% 64.5% 43.4% 52.8% 52.7% 56.5% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 17/17 2.6 4.9 68.4% 63.0% 42.0% 43.8% 46.7% 56.8% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 40/46 2.5 3.5 67.9% 64.9% 45.5% 51.1% 50.1% 58.6% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 5/5 1.6 4.0 76.0% 63.4% 43.9% 59.5% 62.2% 57.8% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 26/26 3.0 4.8 62.0% 65.2% 45.9% 57.5% 47.3% 57.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 44/45 3.3 4.0 61.4% 66.7% 49.9% 53.6% 49.7% 60.5% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 18/24 3.3 4.9 60.8% 65.5% 42.7% 48.1% 49.6% 56.0% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 5/6 2.8 5.0 55.8% 63.4% 35.4% 43.7% 16.8% 51.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 675/751 2.7 5.0 61.4% 65.7% 44.9% 52.4% 48.6% 57.5% 44.0% — 76/82 2.8 3.9 56.3% 64.8% 45.9% 49.7% 45.4% 56.4% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Jamie Hampton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1497 106.7 -0.12 +2.94 0.708 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1495 95.3 -1.54 +1.90 0.198 21.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1594 123.9 +0.60 +1.13 1.055 51.1% -34 -21 +41 55.0% +0.70 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.0 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1703 137.4 +0.76 +0.27 1.001 50.1% +30 -139 -61 55.8% +0.34 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 96.6 +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 1824 147.5 +0.89 +3.14 1.073 51.5% +11 -209 -176 60.6% +0.69 12–5 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 108.5 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1813 146.7 +2.42 +2.57 1.110 52.3% -13 -37 -201 62.8% +0.83 11–14 (44%) 8–7 (53%) 95.3 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 1713 124.6 -0.76 -0.32 0.950 49.0% -8 +17 -68 45.2% -0.40 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.72 2010 1479 103.9 -0.11 -2.35 0.708 43.2% +21 — — 14.3% -2.29 0–1 — — -0.01
21 2013 1799 143.5 +3.24 +0.98 1.086 51.6% +2 -43 — 58.4% +0.54 10–9 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 100.1 -0.38 2011 1416 98.1 -3.25 -1.15 0.794 44.7% +35 +87 — 15.0% -1.95 1–1 0–1 — +0.26
22 2014 1764 137.7 +1.25 -0.29 0.980 49.9% +33 -44 -144 54.8% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 8–5 (62%) 104.1 +0.90 2012 1594 131.6 +0.40 -0.39 0.984 49.8% +4 -85 — 51.1% +0.21 3–0 (100%) 3–3 (50%) 106.2 -0.51
23 2015 1869 139.6 +1.52 -0.40 0.997 49.9% +23 -165 -236 54.6% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–8 (53%) 108.8 -1.25 2013 1768 136.2 +2.15 +1.25 1.076 51.4% -53 -134 -96 58.3% +0.53 10–4 (71%) 7–10 (41%) 108.7 -0.40
24 2016 1750 138.9 +1.58 +1.71 1.055 51.0% -10 -52 -71 49.5% +0.19 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 96.0 -0.64 2014 1786 105.9 +0.19 +1.81 1.246 55.0% -44 — — 75.0% +1.62 2–0 — — +0.31
25 2017 1833 151.2 +2.14 +2.10 1.077 51.6% +42 -19 -187 58.9% +0.68 16–9 (64%) 7–10 (41%) 101.9 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 1806 145.1 +1.80 +0.68 1.031 50.5% +1 +47 -166 49.5% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.9 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1797 148.1 +0.11 +1.68 1.017 50.5% +27 -20 — 51.5% +0.15 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 96.0 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1803 141.4 +0.01 +2.18 1.037 50.4% +63 -58 — 50.0% +0.20 4–2 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 102.3 -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1835 148.9 +1.86 +2.03 1.077 51.4% -27 +92 -189 58.1% +0.77 6–7 (46%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1793 111.4 +0.38 +1.45 1.125 52.8% +16 — — 53.8% +0.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1815 138.1 +0.92 +1.92 1.054 51.1% -40 +71 — 50.8% +0.34 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1846 155.5 +3.69 +0.67 1.095 51.8% +87 -44 -230 56.0% +0.51 6–8 (43%) 7–2 (78%) 100.6 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1811 137.4 -0.74 -2.12 0.901 47.9% +27 -60 -83 46.3% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1728 114.6 -1.24 -1.82 0.702 43.0% +26 — — 7.7% -2.46 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1944 149.9 +1.44 +1.21 1.037 50.8% +15 -30 -132 54.5% +0.35 137–115 (54%) 101–91 (53%) 100.2 -0.90 — 1803 130.3 +0.81 +0.35 0.999 49.9% -19 -80 -96 50.6% +0.10 16–6 (73%) 10–14 (42%) 111.7 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.