H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 0-2
Jil Teichmann holds a 2–0 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2023 Adelaide 2 third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2023* | Adelaide 2 | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Jil Teichmann | 7-5 6-4 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2020* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #400 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,936 | 415 | 324 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,867 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2016 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,744 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,805 | 0 | 12 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 12 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 12 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #11 | 1,826 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,786 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,839 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,725 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |