H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Kai-Chen Chang H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2012 Washington quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012 | Washington | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-4 6-4 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #400 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,936 | 415 | 324 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Kai-Chen Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,867 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,744 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,805 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #11 | 1,826 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,786 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,839 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,725 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |