H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Sabine Lisicki H2H: 1-0

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 1–0 lead over Sabine Lisicki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2013 New Haven round of 16 7-5 6-3.

Russia Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #34 7-5 6-3 Sabine Lisicki #18 Match data Aug 23, 2013* R16 New Haven Premier modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #445 #11 3,590 1,944 422 328 56.3% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,921 211 176 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Sabine Lisicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,593 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,702 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,824 0 2 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,608 0 0
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,813 0 3 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,794 0 1
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,712 0 3 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,659 0 1
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,798 0 5 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,878 0 3
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,764 0 7 2012 17–19 47.2% #37 1,720 0 3
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,868 0 8 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,844 0 3
24 2016 26–25 51.0% #27 1,749 0 8 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,818 0 4
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,795 0 4
26 2018 21–21 50.0% #42 1,806 0 12 2016 15–21 41.7% #93 1,639 0 4
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,797 0 12 2017 5–5 50.0% #220 1,633 0 4
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,802 0 12 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,547 0 4
29 2021 27–19 58.7% #11 1,835 0 12 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,478 0 4
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,793 0 12
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,814 0 12
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,846 0 12 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,574 0 4
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,810 0 12 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,568 0 4
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #445 1,727 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Sabine Lisicki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
16 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2010 31 14 45 68.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 14 13 27 51.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 2011 26 15 41 63.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 15 11 26 57.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2012 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 4 9 13 30.8%
21 2013 26 16 42 61.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 19 9 28 67.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7%
22 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2015 29 14 43 67.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 18 11 29 62.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
24 2016 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2014 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 1 5 80.0%
25 2017 31 17 48 64.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4%
26 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 2019 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2018 5 4 9 55.6%
29 2021 15 14 29 51.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2023 6 8 14 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 2024 21 13 34 61.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
33 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 2026 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 298 220 518 57.5% 90 74 164 54.9% 27 30 57 47.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 128 113 241 53.1% 38 43 81 46.9% 45 20 65 69.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 675/751 of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's and 346/387 of Sabine Lisicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Sabine Lisicki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.9% 63.0% 41.7% 42.9% 50.0% 52.9% 33.3% —/—
15 2007 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% 27.8% 14.3% —/—
16 2008 14/18 1.9 3.1 57.9% 64.6% 45.1% 37.4% 48.4% 56.5% 45.9% 2006 1/1 3.0 8.0 49.4% 65.8% 35.9% 45.5% 33.3% 50.6% 42.0%
17 2009 43/44 2.0 5.1 58.9% 64.8% 43.9% 52.3% 46.7% 56.0% 44.0% 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 49.0% 48.0% 46.2% 50.0% 0.0% 47.1% 30.4%
18 2010 54/60 2.6 5.3 59.2% 64.8% 45.4% 54.3% 46.6% 56.8% 46.4% 2008 27/34 4.6 7.2 56.7% 68.5% 38.4% 52.4% 54.9% 55.4% 46.0%
19 2011 55/58 3.0 6.1 60.1% 67.0% 46.1% 50.9% 53.5% 58.3% 46.3% 2009 41/46 4.9 6.3 54.0% 70.6% 44.5% 47.2% 52.2% 58.6% 44.7%
20 2012 40/44 2.4 5.6 59.2% 64.5% 41.9% 50.5% 46.8% 55.0% 42.7% 2010 13/13 4.5 5.5 52.1% 66.4% 47.9% 56.4% 41.1% 57.5% 44.1%
21 2013 47/55 2.9 5.4 56.6% 68.7% 46.2% 52.4% 48.3% 59.1% 44.5% 2011 44/48 5.4 4.0 54.1% 74.3% 49.2% 62.2% 50.3% 62.9% 47.5%
22 2014 38/46 3.9 7.4 56.4% 69.2% 39.6% 55.3% 52.4% 56.4% 42.7% 2012 29/36 4.6 5.3 56.4% 65.4% 43.5% 48.7% 49.9% 55.8% 42.5%
23 2015 38/55 2.3 5.4 65.0% 65.0% 49.8% 53.2% 46.1% 59.4% 40.5% 2013 51/53 5.7 3.7 55.8% 71.5% 47.1% 57.6% 46.8% 60.6% 44.9%
24 2016 42/51 2.8 4.0 62.7% 65.6% 43.7% 49.9% 53.7% 57.3% 45.0% 2014 44/48 5.3 6.0 56.2% 66.5% 42.2% 53.2% 52.3% 55.9% 44.9%
25 2017 64/64 3.0 4.5 62.3% 65.3% 46.2% 57.3% 45.7% 58.2% 45.1% 2015 38/41 6.1 5.5 61.7% 68.6% 49.6% 51.9% 45.5% 61.2% 41.8%
26 2018 40/42 2.6 4.3 65.0% 66.1% 43.9% 53.5% 44.9% 58.5% 42.8% 2016 30/36 4.1 5.1 56.7% 65.7% 45.0% 54.8% 50.2% 57.0% 42.3%
27 2019 43/43 2.3 4.7 62.3% 64.5% 43.4% 52.8% 52.7% 56.5% 44.2% 2017 7/10 5.0 5.3 57.0% 65.3% 43.1% 49.3% 44.1% 55.9% 38.7%
28 2020 17/17 2.6 4.9 68.4% 63.0% 42.0% 43.8% 46.7% 56.8% 44.8% 2018 9/9 4.7 6.8 53.8% 66.4% 38.0% 51.6% 47.3% 53.6% 44.3%
29 2021 40/46 2.5 3.5 67.9% 64.9% 45.5% 51.1% 50.1% 58.6% 44.6% 2019 4/4 7.0 5.0 50.7% 68.5% 43.6% 35.5% 31.3% 56.1% 34.9%
30 2022 5/5 1.6 4.0 76.0% 63.4% 43.9% 59.5% 62.2% 57.8% 47.5% —/—
31 2023 26/26 3.0 4.8 62.0% 65.2% 45.9% 57.5% 47.3% 57.1% 45.2% —/—
32 2024 44/45 3.3 4.0 61.4% 66.7% 49.9% 53.6% 49.7% 60.5% 43.2% 2022 4/4 6.0 6.0 55.5% 72.1% 44.7% 61.8% 20.8% 59.9% 37.8%
33 2025 18/24 3.3 4.9 60.8% 65.5% 42.7% 48.1% 49.6% 56.0% 39.6% 2023 3/3 9.0 7.3 50.8% 69.6% 47.4% 64.9% 17.8% 57.6% 34.6%
34 2026 5/6 2.8 5.0 55.8% 63.4% 35.4% 43.7% 16.8% 51.0% 34.4% —/—
Career 675/751 2.7 5.0 61.4% 65.7% 44.9% 52.4% 48.6% 57.5% 44.0% 346/387 5.2 5.3 56.0% 69.0% 45.2% 53.8% 48.5% 58.5% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Sabine Lisicki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1497 106.7 -0.12 +2.94 0.708 42.6% 0.0% -3.00 -0.15
15 2007 1495 95.3 -1.54 +1.90 0.198 21.9% 0.0% -5.50 -0.22
16 2008 1594 123.9 +0.60 +1.13 1.055 51.1% -34 -21 +41 55.0% +0.70 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.0 -0.10 2006 1490 97.8 -4.35 +1.90 0.851 46.2% 33.3% -2.00 0–1 0.00
17 2009 1703 137.4 +0.76 +0.27 1.001 50.1% +30 -139 -61 55.8% +0.34 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 96.6 +1.57 2007 1475 92.7 -4.39 -4.73 0.575 39.2% 0.0% -4.50 +0.17
18 2010 1824 147.5 +0.89 +3.14 1.073 51.5% +11 -209 -176 60.6% +0.69 12–5 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 108.5 -0.83 2008 1609 133.9 +0.46 +1.65 1.031 50.7% +18 -91 48.8% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 -0.68
19 2011 1813 146.7 +2.42 +2.57 1.110 52.3% -13 -37 -201 62.8% +0.83 11–14 (44%) 8–7 (53%) 95.3 -0.73 2009 1795 142.8 +2.82 +1.50 1.080 51.5% -77 -94 -115 67.0% +1.00 5–9 (36%) 8–5 (62%) 101.1 -1.35
20 2012 1713 124.6 -0.76 -0.32 0.950 49.0% -8 +17 -68 45.2% -0.40 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.72 2010 1660 119.1 +0.56 +0.05 1.039 50.7% -50 39.1% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +1.00
21 2013 1799 143.5 +3.24 +0.98 1.086 51.6% +2 -43 58.4% +0.54 10–9 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 100.1 -0.38 2011 1878 150.7 +6.12 +3.41 1.281 54.9% -103 -151 +55 71.6% +1.55 5–4 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 -1.88
22 2014 1764 137.7 +1.25 -0.29 0.980 49.9% +33 -44 -144 54.8% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 8–5 (62%) 104.1 +0.90 2012 1720 130.9 +0.96 +0.55 0.960 49.3% -29 -44 +213 50.0% -0.14 9–9 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.1 -0.58
23 2015 1869 139.6 +1.52 -0.40 0.997 49.9% +23 -165 -236 54.6% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–8 (53%) 108.8 -1.25 2013 1844 146.6 +4.46 +1.57 1.140 52.5% -62 -114 +222 64.1% +1.09 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 102.7 -1.08
24 2016 1750 138.9 +1.58 +1.71 1.055 51.0% -10 -52 -71 49.5% +0.19 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 96.0 -0.64 2014 1818 138.6 +0.60 +1.87 1.017 50.4% -31 -117 +227 56.5% +0.41 13–7 (65%) 3–5 (38%) 102.1 -0.86
25 2017 1833 151.2 +2.14 +2.10 1.077 51.6% +42 -19 -187 58.9% +0.68 16–9 (64%) 7–10 (41%) 101.9 -0.09 2015 1795 140.5 +2.78 +0.69 1.077 51.3% +8 -130 +203 55.2% +0.35 5–11 (31%) 9–9 (50%) 94.4 -0.18
26 2018 1806 145.1 +1.80 +0.68 1.031 50.5% +1 +47 -166 49.5% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.9 -1.51 2016 1640 122.1 +0.47 -0.96 0.982 49.4% +15 -29 +307 46.3% -0.07 1–8 (11%) 1–7 (13%) 85.1 +0.16
27 2019 1797 148.1 +0.11 +1.68 1.017 50.5% +27 -20 51.5% +0.15 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 96.0 -0.49 2017 1634 104.3 -1.13 -0.41 0.878 47.6% +5 +286 50.0% -0.55 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.0 +0.09
28 2020 1803 141.4 +0.01 +2.18 1.037 50.4% +63 -58 50.0% +0.20 4–2 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 102.3 -0.92 2018 1547 109.2 -1.76 -0.60 0.954 48.7% +1 47.6% -0.28 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +0.66
29 2021 1835 148.9 +1.86 +2.03 1.077 51.4% -27 +92 -189 58.1% +0.77 6–7 (46%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 -0.77 2019 1478 99.2 +1.15 -1.10 0.795 44.9% +20 11.1% -2.22 0–1 -0.75
30 2022 1793 111.4 +0.38 +1.45 1.125 52.8% +16 53.8% +0.69 0–3 (0%) +0.51 2020 1519 101.5
31 2023 1815 138.1 +0.92 +1.92 1.054 51.1% -40 +71 50.8% +0.34 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 -0.81
32 2024 1846 155.5 +3.69 +0.67 1.095 51.8% +87 -44 -230 56.0% +0.51 6–8 (43%) 7–2 (78%) 100.6 -0.60 2022 1575 103.5 -0.52 -1.10 0.944 48.2% +332 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 +0.47
33 2025 1811 137.5 -0.74 -2.12 0.901 47.9% +27 -60 -83 46.3% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -0.64 2023 1569 105.0 -1.38 +0.08 0.816 46.0% 14.3% -1.71 0–1 0–1 -0.05
34 2026 1727 114.6 -1.24 -1.82 0.702 43.0% +27 7.7% -2.46 0–1 0–1 -0.27
Career 1944 149.9 +1.44 +1.21 1.037 50.8% +15 -30 -132 54.5% +0.35 137–115 (54%) 101–91 (53%) 100.2 -0.90 1922 140.4 +2.23 +1.19 1.059 51.1% -33 -94 +169 55.9% +0.44 57–72 (44%) 48–43 (53%) 98.5 -1.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.