H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Anastasia Potapova vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Potapova holds a 1–0 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Potapova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Potapova won the 2019 New York third round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2019* | New York | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Potapova | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |