Anastasia Potapova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucia Bronzetti | 6 | 0 | 6 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Mirra Andreeva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 11, 2026 | H2H |
| Marta Kostyuk | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 30, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anastasia Potapova vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Potapova holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Potapova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Potapova won the 2019 Wimbledon first round 2-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Jil Teichmann | Match data | Jul 3, 2019* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | #25 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 168 | 136 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jil Teichmann | #175 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 94 | 104 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #25 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #175 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2023 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2025 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2026 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 99 | 93 | 192 | 51.6% | 57 | 29 | 86 | 66.3% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | — | 50 | 61 | 111 | 45.0% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 289/306 of Anastasia Potapova's and 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 45.2% | 47.4% | 39.1% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 51.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 13/13 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 53.4% | 66.4% | 45.1% | 60.2% | 45.2% | 56.5% | 46.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 6.0 | 51.4% | 60.6% | 41.1% | 53.0% | 45.4% | 51.0% | 43.6% | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% |
| 19 | 2020 | 10/10 | 3.2 | 4.9 | 52.1% | 64.6% | 47.2% | 46.9% | 48.4% | 55.8% | 46.2% | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% |
| 20 | 2021 | 30/31 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 53.9% | 64.6% | 42.0% | 49.2% | 50.1% | 53.8% | 43.8% | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% |
| 21 | 2022 | 41/42 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 63.3% | 63.5% | 45.7% | 51.0% | 52.1% | 56.5% | 47.7% | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% |
| 22 | 2023 | 47/47 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.9% | 63.6% | 44.6% | 55.2% | 45.0% | 55.5% | 45.4% | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2024 | 48/48 | 2.3 | 4.8 | 55.5% | 64.4% | 43.4% | 56.9% | 46.7% | 55.1% | 43.4% | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2025 | 26/40 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 52.9% | 62.3% | 46.2% | 46.5% | 46.3% | 54.6% | 41.7% | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% |
| 25 | 2026 | 43/44 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 56.4% | 65.0% | 42.0% | 55.9% | 53.8% | 54.7% | 44.7% | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 67.7% | 58.6% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 47.9% | 56.0% | 45.9% |
| Career | — | 289/306 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 63.7% | 43.8% | 53.2% | 48.4% | 54.8% | 44.7% | — | 184/198 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 60.9% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.8% | 46.6% | 56.5% | 42.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1476 | 93.4 | -2.12 | +2.32 | 0.895 | 47.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1607 | 121.2 | +0.26 | +1.15 | 1.064 | 51.7% | -33 | +21 | — | 62.1% | +0.55 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 1596 | 119.2 | -3.93 | +0.45 | 0.889 | 47.4% | -23 | +78 | — | 47.1% | -0.33 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.0 | -0.21 | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | 2020 | 1685 | 126.6 | -0.49 | +1.81 | 1.046 | 50.5% | -11 | — | — | 54.2% | +0.17 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.7 | +0.34 | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 20 | 2021 | 1686 | 132.7 | -1.94 | +1.28 | 0.948 | 48.7% | +15 | -64 | -81 | 44.1% | -0.59 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.7 | -1.41 | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1751 | 139.2 | -0.34 | +3.77 | 1.098 | 52.0% | -56 | +77 | — | 55.8% | +0.50 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.9 | -1.01 | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -95 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2023 | 1785 | 143.8 | -0.78 | +2.73 | 1.022 | 50.4% | -38 | +98 | -91 | 56.4% | +0.32 | 17–10 (63%) | 6–7 (46%) | 105.1 | -0.08 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +83 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2024 | 1800 | 140.8 | -1.22 | +0.81 | 0.965 | 49.4% | +5 | +41 | -88 | 54.7% | +0.18 | 10–6 (63%) | 2–8 (20%) | 99.1 | +0.19 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 |
| 24 | 2025 | 1840 | 139.6 | -1.70 | -0.49 | 0.920 | 48.4% | -30 | +40 | — | 54.9% | +0.12 | 9–4 (69%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.3 | -0.64 | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 |
| 25 | 2026 | 1877 | 144.9 | -1.41 | +1.96 | 0.988 | 50.0% | -85 | +155 | -231 | 55.9% | +0.35 | 12–5 (71%) | 5–7 (42%) | 105.9 | +0.54 | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +76 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1648 | 117.6 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +30 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.29 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1708 | 124.4 | +0.08 | +2.08 | 1.042 | 51.0% | — | +59 | — | 70.6% | +0.94 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.30 |
| Career | — | 1966 | 142.0 | -1.36 | +1.66 | 0.988 | 49.8% | -28 | +77 | -115 | 53.8% | +0.15 | 71–46 (61%) | 36–41 (47%) | 105.9 | -0.37 | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.29 | +0.25 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +5 | +91 | -158 | 49.2% | -0.12 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.64 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jil Teichmann
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |