H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anastasia Rodionova vs Elena Bovina H2H: 0-1
Elena Bovina holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2002 Quebec City semifinal 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2002* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Elena Bovina | 6-1 6-0 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Rodionova | #872 | #62 | 1,095 | 1,649 | 86 | 150 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Rodionova | Elena Bovina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #165 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #95 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #139 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #162 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #390 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |