H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Emilie Loit H2H: 1-0

Anastasia Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Rodionova #106 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Emilie Loit #51 Match data Jun 28, 2006* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 84/242 of Emilie Loit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Emilie Loit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0%
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2%
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6%
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5%
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5%
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2%
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8%
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.