H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 0-4

Maria Sharapova holds a 4–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2012 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
Maria Sharapova
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Sharapova #1 6-2 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #133 Match data Jun 27, 2012* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Maria Sharapova #7 6-1 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #113 Match data Aug 18, 2011* R32 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Maria Sharapova #2 6-0 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #100 Match data Jan 18, 2007* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Maria Sharapova #4 6-3 6-1 Anastasia Rodionova #106 Match data Aug 10, 2006* R32 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maria Sharapova #373 #1 10,690 2,264 601 175 77.4% 5 14 1 7 9 36

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Maria Sharapova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #188 1,503 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2003 24–12 66.7% #32 1,778 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 2004 55–16 77.5% #4 2,074 1 7
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 2005 53–13 80.3% #4 2,099 1 10
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 2006 59–10 85.5% #2 2,239 2 15
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 2007 40–12 76.9% #5 2,146 2 16
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 2008 31–6 83.8% #9 2,158 3 19
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2009 31–9 77.5% #14 2,076 3 20
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2010 33–11 75.0% #18 1,991 3 22
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2011 43–13 76.8% #4 1,994 3 24
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2012 60–11 84.5% #2 2,167 4 27
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2013 37–8 82.2% #4 2,170 4 29
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2014 50–13 79.4% #2 2,102 5 33
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 2015 35–10 77.8% #4 2,066 5 35
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 2016 4–1 80.0% #91 2,074 5 35
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 2017 16–7 69.6% #61 2,007 5 36
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 2018 21–11 65.6% #29 1,923 5 36
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 2019 8–8 50.0% #133 1,877 5 36
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 2020 0–2 0.0% #373 1,837 5 36
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Maria Sharapova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 0 4 100.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 34 12 46 73.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 0 12 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 29 8 37 78.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 5 1 6 83.3%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 45 5 50 90.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2007 24 7 31 77.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 17 2 19 89.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 20 5 25 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 19 7 26 73.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 25 10 35 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 32 7 39 82.1% 19 1 20 95.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 19 4 23 82.6% 17 3 20 85.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 26 10 36 72.2% 19 1 20 95.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 18 6 24 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 11 4 15 73.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 354 112 466 76.0% 148 35 183 80.9% 81 21 102 79.4% 18 7 25 72.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 590/773 of Maria Sharapova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Maria Sharapova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/36 3.4 3.4 60.1% 67.5% 51.4% 76.6% 46.5% 60.6% 44.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 16/71 4.6 4.6 61.6% 71.8% 51.7% 55.0% 50.1% 64.2% 49.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 31/66 3.6 3.0 63.9% 68.3% 51.1% 63.2% 45.2% 61.9% 47.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 65/69 4.2 3.5 65.7% 70.2% 49.3% 58.9% 54.6% 63.1% 49.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 47/52 3.7 5.9 64.2% 68.9% 43.8% 58.5% 55.5% 59.9% 48.0%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% 2008 30/37 3.6 5.7 65.5% 71.3% 48.2% 63.1% 51.1% 63.3% 50.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 37/40 3.6 7.7 64.4% 65.2% 42.0% 48.7% 52.0% 56.9% 49.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 41/44 4.0 5.6 63.1% 73.2% 46.4% 53.5% 50.3% 63.1% 47.9%
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% 2011 50/56 2.4 6.3 66.7% 66.1% 41.9% 50.2% 58.7% 58.0% 50.4%
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% 2012 58/71 3.2 4.8 66.3% 68.4% 48.4% 62.4% 51.3% 61.8% 49.9%
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% 2013 40/45 4.1 4.6 62.8% 73.6% 49.3% 59.7% 53.1% 64.8% 49.6%
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% 2014 56/63 3.3 5.8 61.4% 68.9% 47.1% 51.5% 55.2% 60.5% 50.1%
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% 2015 37/45 4.1 5.3 62.2% 72.8% 54.6% 61.7% 46.1% 65.8% 46.6%
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% 2016 5/5 11.0 4.8 56.2% 77.4% 45.6% 42.7% 38.3% 63.3% 51.1%
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% 2017 22/23 5.6 5.5 57.6% 71.2% 46.3% 58.5% 49.4% 60.8% 46.0%
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% 2018 31/32 4.6 6.3 59.4% 66.9% 44.2% 50.3% 49.0% 57.7% 47.0%
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% 2019 15/16 3.2 5.5 63.8% 64.3% 43.2% 53.1% 40.4% 56.9% 44.9%
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% 2020 2/2 6.0 8.0 57.4% 70.1% 45.0% 33.3% 41.7% 59.5% 32.6%
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 590/776 3.8 5.3 63.6% 69.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.7% 61.3% 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Maria Sharapova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1504 110.4 — — — — +30 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — -0.19
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1779 134.3 +2.16 +0.59 1.123 52.8% -35 — -9 62.2% +1.01 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 103.1 +1.00
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2075 160.2 +5.99 +3.49 1.370 56.2% -57 -383 +32 70.6% +1.66 15–6 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 106.7 -0.75
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 2005 2099 166.8 +5.53 +3.06 1.233 54.4% +3 -259 +90 73.5% +1.92 17–4 (81%) 7–4 (64%) 110.0 -1.58
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 2006 2239 171.2 +7.19 +5.40 1.327 55.9% +47 -395 -48 83.2% +2.22 6–3 (67%) 9–1 (90%) 106.5 -0.72
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 2007 2147 162.6 +4.20 +4.33 1.195 53.9% +73 -223 +47 73.2% +1.66 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 101.7 -1.40
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 2008 2158 159.5 +6.81 +5.50 1.362 56.2% +107 -167 — 77.8% +2.09 10–3 (77%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -0.56
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2009 2076 148.9 +1.97 +5.02 1.140 52.9% +130 -100 -34 66.3% +1.14 14–3 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 100.7 +0.32
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2010 1992 156.3 +6.24 +4.11 1.299 55.3% +92 -12 +88 69.6% +1.69 9–5 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 96.6 0.00
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2011 1994 155.2 +2.58 +6.97 1.200 54.1% -10 +64 +124 70.2% +1.52 12–1 (92%) 8–2 (80%) 108.8 +0.41
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2012 2167 168.4 +6.37 +7.20 1.305 55.7% -46 +49 -37 75.8% +1.95 14–1 (93%) 8–6 (57%) 109.9 -3.27
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2013 2171 165.9 +8.74 +6.16 1.409 56.7% -28 +101 — 80.0% +2.14 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 -1.17
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2014 2102 166.1 +4.81 +7.11 1.270 55.2% -43 +205 -9 69.7% +1.51 20–8 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 97.7 -1.90
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 2015 2066 159.8 +6.34 +5.11 1.365 55.9% -11 +167 +15 74.5% +2.02 8–2 (80%) 0–6 (0%) 96.3 -1.45
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 2016 2074 132.1 +2.31 +3.11 1.391 56.6% -2 — — 72.7% +2.18 1–0 0–1 — -0.38
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 2017 2008 140.4 +3.36 +2.15 1.173 53.4% +44 +217 — 68.6% +1.41 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.43
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 2018 1923 146.3 +1.41 +3.43 1.111 52.2% +35 +236 — 63.0% +0.96 5–6 (45%) 3–3 (50%) 92.0 +0.14
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 2019 1877 145.3 +0.28 +1.89 1.042 50.8% +56 — +135 59.3% +0.59 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 -1.54
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 2020 1838 108.1 +0.15 +0.49 0.806 46.2% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.11
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 2265 167.5 +5.03 +5.13 1.257 54.8% +13 +7 +28 72.0% +1.67 161–60 (73%) 74–61 (55%) 104.4 -1.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.