H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anastasia Rodionova vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 0-4
Maria Sharapova holds a 4–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2012 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Maria Sharapova | 6-2 6-3 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2011* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-1 6-3 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-0 6-3 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2006* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-3 6-1 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Rodionova | #872 | #62 | 1,095 | 1,649 | 86 | 150 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Rodionova | Maria Sharapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 |
| 21 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #165 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 |
| 22 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 |
| 26 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #95 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 |
| 28 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 |
| 29 | 2011 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #139 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #162 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 |
| 32 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #390 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |