H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anastasia Rodionova vs Tiantian Sun H2H: 1-1
Anastasia Rodionova and Tiantian Sun are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2008 Bangalore third round 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008* | Bangalore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Rodionova | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | Tiantian Sun | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2006* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Tiantian Sun | 6-1 6-3 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Rodionova | #872 | #62 | 1,095 | 1,649 | 86 | 150 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,650 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anastasia Rodionova | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #165 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #95 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #139 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #162 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #390 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |