H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anastasia Rodionova and Tiantian Sun are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2008 Bangalore round of 32 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Rodionova | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | Tiantian Sun | Match data | Mar 6, 2008* | R32 | Bangalore | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Tiantian Sun | 6-1 6-3 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data | Oct 7, 2006* | QF | Tashkent | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Rodionova | #872 | #62 | 1,095 | 1,650 | 86 | 150 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,649 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anastasia Rodionova | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #118 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #165 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #95 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #139 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #162 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #185 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #390 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Anastasia Rodionova | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2004 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 22.2% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 51 | 94 | 145 | 35.2% | 25 | 39 | 64 | 39.1% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | Career | 22 | 41 | 63 | 34.9% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 28/56 of Tiantian Sun's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Anastasia Rodionova | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2003 | 1/15 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 60.0% | 64.1% | 26.9% | 66.7% | 0.0% | 49.2% | 32.1% | 2003 | 1/9 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 60.5% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 28.6% | 48.4% | 40.0% |
| 2006 | 5/25 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 68.3% | 50.8% | 35.0% | 38.1% | 31.3% | 46.0% | 38.2% | 2006 | 9/24 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 67.2% | 58.1% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 49.3% | 53.8% | 37.5% |
| 2007 | 22/31 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 63.8% | 54.6% | 44.9% | 38.2% | 58.7% | 51.1% | 37.2% | 2007 | 14/18 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 65.0% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 44.6% | 35.3% | 51.3% | 40.4% |
| 2008 | 24/28 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 60.0% | 57.0% | 40.4% | 47.2% | 45.2% | 50.9% | 40.3% | 2008 | 4/5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 65.6% | 55.4% | 41.8% | 51.8% | 30.6% | 51.0% | 36.8% |
| 2009 | 13/14 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 65.0% | 55.0% | 41.5% | 36.4% | 48.0% | 50.3% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 30/37 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 62.3% | 60.2% | 44.7% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 54.8% | 42.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 27/29 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 63.7% | 54.5% | 41.4% | 45.3% | 48.2% | 49.8% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 16/19 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 63.5% | 59.4% | 41.7% | 50.9% | 45.6% | 53.1% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 8/9 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 62.2% | 60.7% | 45.2% | 52.3% | 48.1% | 54.5% | 38.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 3/5 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 60.6% | 48.4% | 39.1% | 49.1% | 44.4% | 44.7% | 36.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1/3 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 56.7% | 68.4% | 44.8% | 33.3% | 18.2% | 58.2% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 56.3% | 59.3% | 47.6% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 54.2% | 32.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 65.7% | 58.1% | 52.6% | 40.0% | 62.2% | 56.2% | 52.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 154/236 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 62.9% | 56.9% | 42.6% | 45.3% | 49.4% | 51.7% | 40.2% | Career | 28/81 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 65.6% | 56.6% | 42.8% | 47.8% | 38.8% | 52.0% | 38.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Anastasia Rodionova | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2000 | 1491 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.10 | 2002 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.19 |
| 2001 | 1468 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | 2003 | 1451 | 101.0 | -0.20 | -1.27 | 0.776 | 43.9% | +17 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.54 |
| 2002 | 1521 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 68.8% | +1.25 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.66 | 2004 | 1430 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +118 | — | 24.0% | -1.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 2003 | 1546 | 112.1 | -0.41 | -1.53 | 0.632 | 41.5% | +13 | -5 | +64 | 44.4% | -0.11 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–3 (40%) | 103.0 | +0.44 | 2005 | 1520 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 57.7% | +0.69 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.62 |
| 2004 | 1530 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 2006 | 1629 | 131.4 | -1.14 | -2.98 | 0.811 | 45.8% | -16 | — | — | 52.7% | -0.04 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | -0.16 |
| 2005 | 1516 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.55 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.62 | 2007 | 1505 | 100.0 | -2.48 | -2.77 | 0.830 | 45.9% | +49 | -23 | — | 20.5% | -2.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.7 | -1.14 |
| 2006 | 1531 | 105.6 | -3.96 | -2.68 | 0.708 | 42.0% | +19 | — | +38 | 38.9% | -1.06 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–0 | — | +0.88 | 2008 | 1494 | 101.6 | -1.21 | -2.08 | 0.750 | 43.9% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.7 | +0.02 |
| 2007 | 1526 | 112.8 | -3.50 | -4.50 | 0.761 | 44.3% | +38 | -79 | — | 38.3% | -1.28 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.3 | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1505 | 113.6 | -2.71 | -1.63 | 0.821 | 45.9% | +44 | -61 | — | 29.1% | -1.78 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.2 | -0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1524 | 107.2 | -3.03 | -0.73 | 0.863 | 46.5% | -3 | -24 | — | 41.9% | -0.68 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.2 | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1607 | 116.6 | -0.85 | -0.88 | 0.938 | 48.8% | -41 | -81 | -33 | 43.9% | -0.63 | 8–6 (57%) | 2–3 (40%) | 103.6 | -0.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1547 | 124.2 | -3.69 | -1.81 | 0.811 | 45.4% | -34 | +33 | — | 30.6% | -1.40 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–6 (33%) | 97.8 | -0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1527 | 116.9 | -1.23 | -2.69 | 0.818 | 46.1% | -15 | +15 | +3 | 36.4% | -0.68 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1492 | 113.2 | -0.47 | -2.98 | 0.838 | 46.1% | -9 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1506 | 99.3 | -1.73 | -2.26 | 0.650 | 40.2% | -19 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.75 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1502 | 99.6 | +0.38 | -1.15 | 0.776 | 44.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.83 | — | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1470 | 102.2 | -3.27 | -2.73 | 0.715 | 42.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1483 | 106.0 | +1.78 | +1.28 | 1.200 | 54.3% | — | +62 | — | 66.7% | +1.33 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1445 | 96.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1650 | 116.6 | -2.29 | -2.02 | 0.833 | 46.1% | +6 | -26 | +5 | 38.4% | -0.97 | 31–34 (48%) | 20–24 (45%) | 103.2 | -0.19 | Career | 1650 | 117.9 | -1.79 | -2.69 | 0.810 | 45.5% | 0 | +30 | — | 37.4% | -0.93 | 6–15 (29%) | 11–8 (58%) | 98.4 | -0.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 15, 2011 | H2H |
| Sybille Bammer | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 7, 2008 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 16, 2015 | H2H |
| Vania King | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 31, 2013 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 27, 2012 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 20, 2008 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 8, 2007 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Anastasia Rodionova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 6, 2008 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |