H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Andrea Petkovic holds a 2–0 lead over Jamie Loeb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Petkovic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2018 Washington Open first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 6-1 6-1 | Jamie Loeb | Match data | Aug 2, 2018* | R32 | Washington Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Andrea Petkovic | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | Jamie Loeb | Match data | Mar 1, 2017* | R32 | Acapulco | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,988 | 279 | 228 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Jamie Loeb | #484 | #132 | 460 | 1,577 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,689 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #99 | 1,648 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,725 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #484 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,729 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,708 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2017 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 33 | 10 | 43 | 76.7% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 19 | 18 | 37 | 51.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 170 | 142 | 312 | 54.5% | 79 | 57 | 136 | 58.1% | 24 | 26 | 50 | 48.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/505 of Andrea Petkovic's and 13/13 of Jamie Loeb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2007 | 3/6 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 72.7% | 59.0% | 67.8% | 57.1% | 38.9% | 60.9% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.9% | 44.8% | 42.9% | 50.0% | — | 43.9% | 23.7% |
| 21 | 2009 | 18/19 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 64.4% | 64.3% | 48.7% | 51.8% | 45.7% | 58.4% | 46.5% | 2016 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 55.9% | 53.4% | 45.4% | 41.7% | 14.3% | 49.9% | 26.1% |
| 22 | 2010 | 53/57 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 63.6% | 62.9% | 48.4% | 58.6% | 46.9% | 57.5% | 44.4% | 2017 | 4/4 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 50.4% | 62.8% | 41.8% | 28.7% | 45.8% | 52.5% | 42.1% |
| 23 | 2011 | 56/67 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 70.0% | 62.7% | 50.3% | 56.4% | 50.6% | 59.0% | 48.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 18/18 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 74.6% | 57.5% | 48.1% | 47.6% | 43.6% | 55.2% | 46.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 32/33 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 66.8% | 63.7% | 47.7% | 55.2% | 53.4% | 58.3% | 47.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 52/61 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 68.3% | 61.4% | 46.8% | 48.8% | 51.1% | 56.9% | 46.4% | 2021 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 52.4% | 59.2% | 48.5% | 61.1% | 33.3% | 54.0% | 33.7% |
| 27 | 2015 | 40/54 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 66.0% | 61.4% | 50.5% | 51.1% | 49.4% | 57.6% | 45.3% | 2022 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 58.1% | 73.5% | 37.3% | 62.2% | 21.4% | 58.5% | 28.7% |
| 28 | 2016 | 38/39 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 64.0% | 62.4% | 44.9% | 48.5% | 47.6% | 56.1% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 29/33 | 0.5 | 3.3 | 69.4% | 56.2% | 42.3% | 48.1% | 42.0% | 52.1% | 46.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 26/30 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 66.1% | 60.2% | 47.0% | 58.6% | 47.7% | 55.6% | 44.4% | 2025 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 68.8% | 56.4% | 28.0% | 53.3% | 50.0% | 47.5% | 42.7% |
| 31 | 2019 | 35/35 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 63.0% | 60.8% | 44.2% | 50.1% | 44.5% | 54.7% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 63.5% | 54.5% | 15.8% | 14.3% | 50.0% | 40.4% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 32/32 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 64.5% | 60.6% | 47.6% | 49.0% | 50.7% | 56.0% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 19/20 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 64.9% | 61.1% | 44.2% | 49.2% | 42.7% | 55.3% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 452/507 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 66.5% | 61.4% | 47.3% | 52.2% | 48.0% | 56.6% | 45.4% | — | 13/14 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 60.3% | 42.2% | 46.9% | 31.1% | 52.3% | 34.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2006 | 1497 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 1503 | 107.1 | +1.50 | +0.78 | 1.075 | 51.4% | +9 | +35 | — | 35.7% | -0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 1501 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.24 | 2015 | 1497 | 102.9 | +2.82 | +1.02 | 0.422 | 35.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 21 | 2009 | 1614 | 128.0 | +1.55 | +1.69 | 1.118 | 52.5% | -54 | +32 | — | 55.0% | +0.52 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.67 | 2016 | 1501 | 99.5 | -1.29 | -5.38 | 0.522 | 38.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1788 | 148.0 | +2.10 | +1.40 | 1.046 | 50.9% | -23 | -95 | -103 | 54.8% | +0.44 | 13–10 (57%) | 7–6 (54%) | 106.9 | -2.09 | 2017 | 1535 | 115.6 | -1.34 | -1.45 | 0.887 | 47.6% | +41 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.10 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1974 | 155.4 | +3.70 | +4.59 | 1.176 | 53.6% | -8 | -117 | -298 | 67.6% | +1.21 | 14–6 (70%) | 6–5 (55%) | 107.7 | +0.95 | 2018 | 1520 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1855 | 137.0 | +0.30 | +1.98 | 1.047 | 50.8% | +13 | — | — | 51.3% | +0.38 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.8 | -1.34 | 2019 | 1472 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 1802 | 138.0 | +2.53 | +2.59 | 1.133 | 52.5% | +13 | +56 | — | 56.6% | +0.67 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.4 | -1.81 | 2020 | 1444 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 1828 | 145.1 | +0.94 | +2.73 | 1.076 | 51.6% | -34 | +124 | -137 | 59.4% | +0.64 | 14–7 (67%) | 8–7 (53%) | 104.6 | +0.56 | 2021 | 1439 | 92.5 | +1.84 | +1.86 | 0.732 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.83 | — | — | — | -0.15 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1690 | 138.2 | -0.26 | +3.30 | 1.069 | 51.5% | +6 | +218 | +14 | 52.9% | +0.33 | 10–9 (53%) | 5–8 (38%) | 95.7 | +3.27 | 2022 | 1447 | 104.9 | -0.88 | +0.62 | 0.692 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.14 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1695 | 134.5 | 0.00 | +1.98 | 1.029 | 50.5% | +17 | +124 | +6 | 52.3% | +0.25 | 6–8 (43%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.2 | +0.16 | 2023 | 1428 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1649 | 122.9 | -3.25 | +1.84 | 0.962 | 49.0% | +30 | +25 | +34 | 40.8% | -0.36 | 5–9 (36%) | 3–1 (75%) | 94.0 | +0.52 | 2024 | 1391 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 1725 | 133.1 | -0.84 | +0.44 | 1.000 | 50.1% | +4 | -68 | — | 52.9% | +0.19 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.8 | -0.49 | 2025 | 1422 | 105.4 | -1.30 | -3.22 | 0.813 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1716 | 128.9 | -1.22 | -0.16 | 0.950 | 49.1% | -1 | -46 | -56 | 48.0% | -0.12 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.2 | -0.57 | 2026 | 1410 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1700 | 98.6 | -0.48 | +2.36 | 0.665 | 40.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1730 | 129.0 | -0.07 | +1.75 | 1.016 | 50.4% | -44 | +70 | -86 | 47.8% | -0.01 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–5 (38%) | 97.4 | -2.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1709 | 124.6 | -1.01 | -1.99 | 0.884 | 47.5% | -28 | +78 | -115 | 45.2% | -0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.7 | -1.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1989 | 144.1 | +0.65 | +2.02 | 1.047 | 51.0% | -6 | +34 | -75 | 54.0% | +0.36 | 91–79 (54%) | 53–55 (49%) | 102.0 | -0.93 | — | 1578 | 106.4 | -0.20 | -0.92 | 0.719 | 44.1% | +41 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.66 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.9 | -2.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Kvitova | 6 | 3 | 9 | Aug 29, 2019 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 0 | 8 | 8 | Aug 18, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 17, 2016 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 17, 2016 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jun 27, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 2, 2018 | H2H |
| Lauren Davis | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 24, 2022 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 9, 2022 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 1, 2021 | H2H |