H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Andrea Petkovic vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 0-1
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2016 Madrid second round 6-4 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2016 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Timea Bacsinszky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |