H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Andrea Sestini Hlavackova vs Estrella Cabeza Candela H2H: 1-0
Andrea Sestini Hlavackova holds a 1–0 lead over Estrella Cabeza Candela in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Sestini Hlavackova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Sestini Hlavackova won the 2014 Pattaya third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2014* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | 6-2 6-4 | Estrella Cabeza Candela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | #602 | #58 | 1,055 | 1,641 | 37 | 62 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Estrella Cabeza Candela | #1,268 | #95 | 690 | 1,622 | 26 | 30 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Estrella Cabeza Candela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #162 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #166 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #203 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #284 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #480 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |