H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anett Kontaveit vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 2-0
Anett Kontaveit holds a 2–0 lead over Ekaterina Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2018 Montreal second round 4-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2018* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |