H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anett Kontaveit holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2020 Palermo first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 6-3 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data | Aug 6, 2020* | R32 | Palermo | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,114 | 205 | 140 | 59.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,743 | 41 | 52 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #108 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #232 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,058 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,886 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,779 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2015 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 2016 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2017 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 40 | 13 | 53 | 75.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2020 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 2023 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 139 | 91 | 230 | 60.4% | 46 | 33 | 79 | 58.2% | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | — | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% | 19 | 21 | 40 | 47.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 327/346 of Anett Kontaveit's and 86/90 of Patricia Maria Tig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 60.7% | 43.2% | 37.5% | 53.8% | 100.0% | 41.0% | 34.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 5/6 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 60.9% | 61.7% | 40.9% | 41.7% | 44.7% | 53.1% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 5/11 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 57.9% | 51.5% | 44.8% | 28.1% | 34.6% | 48.4% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 29/30 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 58.9% | 66.1% | 45.4% | 54.5% | 51.5% | 57.6% | 42.4% | 2015 | 7/9 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 66.4% | 60.7% | 49.6% | 63.7% | 63.0% | 57.9% | 44.1% |
| 21 | 2017 | 45/45 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 64.0% | 68.8% | 48.4% | 54.2% | 44.0% | 61.4% | 44.3% | 2016 | 19/19 | 1.9 | 6.6 | 58.4% | 60.6% | 43.5% | 52.1% | 43.8% | 53.4% | 42.6% |
| 22 | 2018 | 55/56 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 62.3% | 63.8% | 46.6% | 57.8% | 51.1% | 57.4% | 44.9% | 2017 | 11/13 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 55.1% | 57.8% | 42.5% | 43.5% | 28.3% | 51.4% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2019 | 38/42 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 63.1% | 66.8% | 48.3% | 61.3% | 45.3% | 59.5% | 43.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 31/31 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 62.2% | 67.6% | 48.2% | 53.1% | 53.1% | 60.2% | 45.4% | 2019 | 12/12 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 64.8% | 63.3% | 46.2% | 65.0% | 47.8% | 57.7% | 46.2% |
| 25 | 2021 | 61/67 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 60.7% | 69.7% | 50.2% | 56.4% | 53.2% | 62.2% | 45.8% | 2020 | 16/16 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 61.4% | 64.4% | 43.6% | 54.4% | 59.3% | 56.0% | 49.3% |
| 26 | 2022 | 45/45 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 63.2% | 66.5% | 47.4% | 54.5% | 47.5% | 59.6% | 44.4% | 2021 | 12/12 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 58.2% | 60.5% | 40.4% | 54.5% | 40.9% | 52.3% | 38.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 12/12 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 62.4% | 64.4% | 43.0% | 46.1% | 37.2% | 56.3% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 6.4 | 59.7% | 50.8% | 36.9% | 46.5% | 44.6% | 45.2% | 41.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1491 | 98.3 | -2.83 | -0.54 | 0.580 | 38.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1466 | 100.3 | -0.85 | +0.51 | 0.936 | 48.5% | — | +74 | — | 28.6% | -1.21 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 1517 | 109.4 | -3.04 | -1.00 | 0.776 | 44.4% | +23 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 1607 | 127.5 | +1.62 | -0.14 | 1.002 | 50.4% | -2 | -120 | -30 | 50.0% | +0.26 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–7 (30%) | 93.8 | -2.22 | 2015 | 1532 | 106.0 | -1.09 | +1.08 | 1.048 | 50.8% | +14 | — | — | 52.9% | -0.29 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.85 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1706 | 137.6 | +4.48 | +1.12 | 1.147 | 52.5% | -91 | +30 | +30 | 56.2% | +0.75 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–9 (44%) | 101.7 | -0.81 | 2016 | 1527 | 104.9 | -1.75 | -1.01 | 0.914 | 48.2% | -21 | +55 | — | 44.7% | -0.62 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.3 | +0.41 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1837 | 141.9 | +0.78 | +2.24 | 1.053 | 51.3% | -76 | +49 | -138 | 53.4% | +0.30 | 15–8 (65%) | 10–5 (67%) | 110.5 | +1.22 | 2017 | 1501 | 110.1 | -3.01 | -2.64 | 0.788 | 44.5% | +29 | +16 | — | 30.4% | -1.48 | 0–1 | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.05 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1876 | 145.7 | +2.85 | +1.08 | 1.066 | 51.5% | +36 | -18 | -176 | 51.8% | +0.09 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | -0.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 1871 | 153.1 | +2.99 | +1.93 | 1.143 | 52.9% | +44 | -8 | — | 61.6% | +1.01 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.31 | 2019 | 1660 | 117.4 | -0.28 | +1.62 | 1.094 | 52.2% | -105 | +70 | — | 64.3% | +0.97 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.92 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2058 | 162.0 | +5.54 | +3.36 | 1.211 | 54.0% | +27 | -175 | -286 | 69.2% | +1.24 | 10–7 (59%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.7 | -1.91 | 2020 | 1728 | 126.3 | -0.51 | +3.24 | 1.123 | 52.8% | -128 | +65 | — | 65.7% | +1.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.17 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1886 | 151.2 | +2.51 | +1.53 | 1.100 | 52.0% | +86 | +5 | — | 61.2% | +0.68 | 8–6 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.1 | +0.40 | 2021 | 1626 | 106.9 | -1.94 | -2.64 | 0.797 | 45.6% | -63 | +83 | -83 | 34.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.9 | -0.48 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1779 | 114.3 | -0.99 | -1.11 | 0.919 | 48.2% | +118 | +17 | — | 40.0% | -0.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1534 | 106.6 | -5.52 | -1.65 | 0.756 | 43.5% | +4 | — | — | 28.6% | -2.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.1 | +0.11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1554 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1469 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | 42.9% | -0.28 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 |
| Career | — | 2114 | 150.2 | +2.78 | +1.61 | 1.089 | 51.8% | +11 | -6 | -112 | 56.8% | +0.53 | 61–49 (55%) | 42–39 (52%) | 103.2 | -1.15 | — | 1743 | 115.2 | -1.84 | -0.19 | 0.930 | 48.5% | -28 | +59 | -83 | 47.1% | -0.38 | 10–16 (38%) | 13–9 (59%) | 98.4 | +3.20 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Feb 13, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 19, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Anastasija Sevastova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 19, 2019 | H2H |