H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Angelika Bachmann vs Evgenia Kulikovskaya H2H: 1-0
Angelika Bachmann holds a 1–0 lead over Evgenia Kulikovskaya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelika Bachmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelika Bachmann won the 1999 Tashkent third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 47
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1999* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Angelika Bachmann | 6-4 6-4 | Evgenia Kulikovskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelika Bachmann | #584 | #130 | 336 | 1,561 | 7 | 19 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evgenia Kulikovskaya | #1,156 | #91 | 391 | 1,547 | 10 | 32 | 23.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelika Bachmann | Evgenia Kulikovskaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #162 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #192 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #186 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #827 | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #181 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |