H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Angelique Kerber and Agnieszka Radwanska are tied 6–6 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 6–4 on hard courts, while Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2016 WTA Finals semifinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | 6-2 6-1 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Oct 29, 2016 | SF | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Oct 9, 2015* | QF | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Aug 8, 2015* | QF | Bank of the West Classic | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-2 6-2 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Oct 21, 2013 | RR | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Oct 5, 2013* | QF | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-4 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Sep 28, 2013* | QF | Pan Pacific Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-1 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Sep 29, 2012* | SF | Pan Pacific Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-3 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Jul 8, 2012* | SF | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Sep 29, 2011* | R32 | Pan Pacific Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Sep 1, 2011* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 5-7 7-6(3) 7-5 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Oct 4, 2010 | R64 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 5-3 (ret.) | Angelique Kerber | Match data | May 7, 2008* | R64 | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,055 | 477 | 277 | 63.3% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 14 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,103 | 513 | 241 | 68.0% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 20 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,980 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2012 | 60–21 | 74.1% | #5 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,944 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,877 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,894 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,961 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,924 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #3 | 1,980 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2016 | 60–19 | 75.9% | #1 | 2,033 | 2 | 10 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,823 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,770 | 2 | 10 | 2018 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #74 | 1,752 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2018 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #2 | 1,934 | 3 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #20 | 1,806 | 3 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,769 | 3 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,936 | 3 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,880 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #205 | 1,830 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 2007 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 30 | 14 | 44 | 68.2% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 63.6% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 21 | 2009 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2012 | 41 | 13 | 54 | 75.9% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 31 | 14 | 45 | 68.9% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 2013 | 46 | 15 | 61 | 75.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 35 | 17 | 52 | 67.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 29 | 14 | 43 | 67.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2015 | 36 | 16 | 52 | 69.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 62.2% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 43 | 13 | 56 | 76.8% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 44 | 12 | 56 | 78.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 21 | 17 | 38 | 55.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 296 | 176 | 472 | 62.7% | 90 | 65 | 155 | 58.1% | 85 | 34 | 119 | 71.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | 370 | 166 | 536 | 69.0% | 75 | 45 | 120 | 62.5% | 66 | 28 | 94 | 70.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 672/754 of Angelique Kerber's and 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10/19 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 65.4% | 59.8% | 46.5% | 60.6% | 47.1% | 55.1% | 46.0% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 41/46 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 60.6% | 62.9% | 47.7% | 57.5% | 43.5% | 57.3% | 44.3% |
| 19 | 2007 | 15/16 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 62.3% | 62.0% | 42.2% | 43.7% | 48.4% | 54.8% | 42.3% | 2008 | 59/72 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 67.0% | 63.2% | 46.8% | 50.4% | 54.4% | 57.9% | 49.2% |
| 20 | 2008 | 17/21 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 66.6% | 56.4% | 40.9% | 45.9% | 45.4% | 51.0% | 46.3% | 2009 | 64/67 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 66.3% | 62.9% | 48.9% | 52.1% | 56.0% | 58.2% | 48.9% |
| 21 | 2009 | 9/9 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 66.0% | 58.4% | 39.8% | 42.7% | 56.5% | 51.7% | 44.4% | 2010 | 49/50 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 65.6% | 64.1% | 50.5% | 51.5% | 47.9% | 59.2% | 48.8% |
| 22 | 2010 | 38/42 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 62.9% | 63.0% | 43.8% | 49.4% | 51.5% | 55.9% | 46.2% | 2011 | 56/64 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 67.1% | 64.4% | 51.4% | 58.4% | 54.0% | 59.9% | 49.6% |
| 23 | 2011 | 35/37 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 62.1% | 62.7% | 44.6% | 54.1% | 51.4% | 55.9% | 47.4% | 2012 | 68/79 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 67.3% | 66.3% | 46.7% | 56.9% | 56.1% | 59.9% | 49.0% |
| 24 | 2012 | 69/81 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 64.7% | 65.8% | 50.1% | 56.8% | 51.8% | 60.0% | 46.3% | 2013 | 69/76 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 64.9% | 65.6% | 50.7% | 55.0% | 53.1% | 60.4% | 48.1% |
| 25 | 2013 | 65/67 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 62.2% | 65.8% | 48.3% | 54.4% | 51.2% | 59.4% | 47.1% | 2014 | 60/65 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 65.5% | 63.3% | 48.2% | 56.8% | 52.0% | 58.2% | 49.8% |
| 26 | 2014 | 62/65 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 65.9% | 63.7% | 45.4% | 57.8% | 48.6% | 57.3% | 47.2% | 2015 | 49/72 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 66.7% | 68.4% | 51.3% | 56.8% | 54.6% | 62.7% | 46.7% |
| 27 | 2015 | 53/73 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 70.2% | 64.1% | 50.9% | 52.5% | 50.1% | 60.0% | 46.2% | 2016 | 60/73 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 62.4% | 67.3% | 47.7% | 60.1% | 57.3% | 60.0% | 49.8% |
| 28 | 2016 | 62/81 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 64.6% | 65.4% | 50.6% | 55.3% | 51.0% | 60.3% | 47.5% | 2017 | 42/43 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 61.8% | 64.9% | 45.8% | 53.6% | 46.7% | 57.5% | 46.3% |
| 29 | 2017 | 51/51 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 65.8% | 64.5% | 48.3% | 50.4% | 42.5% | 59.0% | 43.1% | 2018 | 24/29 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 59.8% | 44.2% | 45.6% | 42.6% | 53.4% | 43.2% |
| 30 | 2018 | 56/63 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 63.7% | 65.7% | 49.3% | 54.9% | 51.0% | 59.7% | 48.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 45/49 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 62.3% | 64.1% | 49.7% | 56.1% | 51.1% | 58.4% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 13/13 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 67.6% | 61.8% | 47.8% | 60.6% | 57.3% | 57.0% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 44/44 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 65.8% | 63.0% | 46.7% | 55.9% | 51.8% | 57.4% | 46.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 22/22 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 66.2% | 62.0% | 49.1% | 64.1% | 46.7% | 57.5% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 16/20 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 69.4% | 60.3% | 43.5% | 58.8% | 57.0% | 55.0% | 41.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 672/756 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 64.9% | 63.9% | 47.7% | 54.5% | 50.3% | 58.2% | 46.2% | — | 651/755 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 65.1% | 64.6% | 48.5% | 55.1% | 52.4% | 59.0% | 48.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1673 | 141.6 | +0.60 | +1.54 | 1.026 | 50.8% | -31 | -111 | +25 | 58.1% | +0.40 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.39 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1516 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.26 | 2007 | 1810 | 145.1 | +1.25 | +1.05 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -9 | -215 | -55 | 57.7% | +0.58 | 8–8 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.85 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1549 | 124.6 | +0.02 | -1.44 | 0.935 | 48.4% | -29 | — | +104 | 34.4% | -0.87 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.88 | 2008 | 1914 | 152.0 | +2.51 | +4.81 | 1.167 | 53.4% | -49 | -105 | +11 | 66.0% | +1.18 | 14–7 (67%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | +0.97 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1504 | 112.7 | -2.69 | +0.78 | 0.944 | 48.5% | +37 | -41 | +104 | 37.8% | -0.69 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | -0.05 | 2009 | 1913 | 151.3 | +2.63 | +4.78 | 1.172 | 53.5% | -27 | -59 | +42 | 62.8% | +0.99 | 11–9 (55%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | +1.49 |
| 21 | 2009 | 1513 | 113.2 | -1.90 | +0.77 | 0.918 | 48.2% | +14 | -33 | — | 38.1% | -0.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.11 | 2010 | 1862 | 156.5 | +3.54 | +5.02 | 1.197 | 53.9% | +37 | -47 | +77 | 66.0% | +1.38 | 2–8 (20%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +2.07 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1668 | 127.6 | +0.01 | +1.81 | 1.048 | 51.1% | -38 | -116 | +2 | 55.8% | +0.35 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–0 (100%) | — | +1.05 | 2011 | 1980 | 161.2 | +4.42 | +6.19 | 1.237 | 54.8% | +22 | -148 | -85 | 67.3% | +1.27 | 12–11 (52%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | +2.26 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1674 | 134.3 | +0.19 | +2.26 | 1.075 | 51.7% | +34 | -185 | — | 51.7% | +0.20 | 3–12 (20%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.30 | 2012 | 1989 | 163.4 | +4.85 | +5.61 | 1.223 | 54.4% | +44 | -42 | -81 | 72.4% | +1.53 | 11–7 (61%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +0.14 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1978 | 159.7 | +4.77 | +3.63 | 1.156 | 53.1% | -43 | -216 | -93 | 65.7% | +1.17 | 20–3 (87%) | 8–8 (50%) | — | -5.25 | 2013 | 1966 | 161.1 | +5.04 | +4.68 | 1.217 | 54.2% | +44 | -43 | -7 | 70.9% | +1.54 | 10–5 (67%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | +1.71 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1944 | 154.5 | +3.64 | +3.42 | 1.160 | 53.2% | +8 | -94 | -90 | 64.3% | +1.08 | 11–11 (50%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +2.00 | 2014 | 1877 | 160.3 | +2.22 | +5.84 | 1.190 | 53.9% | +20 | +68 | +42 | 63.6% | +1.24 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +1.73 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1894 | 152.3 | +1.64 | +4.02 | 1.107 | 52.2% | +8 | -104 | +54 | 62.8% | +0.86 | 13–9 (59%) | 12–6 (67%) | — | +1.84 | 2015 | 1962 | 156.6 | +4.09 | +5.26 | 1.249 | 54.7% | +2 | -94 | -3 | 67.3% | +1.52 | 9–13 (41%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.24 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1925 | 151.7 | +2.11 | +5.08 | 1.156 | 52.9% | -42 | -27 | +57 | 66.1% | +1.10 | 15–11 (58%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | +0.09 | 2016 | 1980 | 161.7 | +4.05 | +6.47 | 1.245 | 54.9% | +48 | -113 | -53 | 72.2% | +1.73 | 8–10 (44%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | +0.07 |
| 28 | 2016 | 2033 | 161.3 | +4.59 | +4.69 | 1.196 | 53.6% | +9 | -126 | -3 | 71.2% | +1.42 | 17–6 (74%) | 10–2 (83%) | — | -2.44 | 2017 | 1823 | 139.7 | +1.36 | +2.93 | 1.090 | 51.9% | +30 | +27 | +110 | 57.7% | +0.56 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +1.52 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1771 | 141.8 | +2.16 | +0.76 | 1.052 | 50.7% | +40 | +66 | +270 | 55.2% | +0.35 | 8–8 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +1.30 | 2018 | 1752 | 134.0 | -1.95 | +0.83 | 0.927 | 48.2% | +14 | — | +160 | 47.6% | -0.17 | 7–2 (78%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.80 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1934 | 162.5 | +3.42 | +5.45 | 1.194 | 53.8% | -31 | -15 | +180 | 69.2% | +1.29 | 12–9 (57%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -1.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 1806 | 145.9 | +1.58 | +3.10 | 1.110 | 52.1% | -9 | +93 | +300 | 59.6% | +0.61 | 6–11 (35%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1769 | 128.3 | -0.58 | -0.32 | 0.999 | 50.1% | +43 | — | — | 53.6% | +0.36 | 1–1 | 2–4 (33%) | — | +1.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1937 | 147.2 | +1.85 | +3.37 | 1.088 | 51.7% | -71 | -89 | +351 | 58.2% | +0.72 | 11–3 (79%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1880 | 133.0 | +1.28 | +1.93 | 1.061 | 51.3% | -34 | +12 | +356 | 54.9% | +0.43 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 1830 | 133.9 | -0.86 | +0.60 | 0.931 | 48.8% | -1 | +62 | +281 | 46.7% | -0.20 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2055 | 154.9 | +2.19 | +3.14 | 1.105 | 52.1% | -7 | -70 | +130 | 60.6% | +0.76 | 134–105 (56%) | 93–66 (58%) | 104.2 | -0.44 | — | 2104 | 161.3 | +3.16 | +4.74 | 1.175 | 53.6% | +16 | -74 | +8 | 65.6% | +1.20 | 107–96 (53%) | 70–61 (53%) | 95.2 | +1.29 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | 8 | 8 | 16 | Mar 13, 2024 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 8 | 6 | 14 | Aug 21, 2021 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 6 | 8 | 14 | Aug 19, 2021 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6 | 8 | 14 | Jan 28, 2020 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Makarova | 8 | 6 | 14 | Mar 10, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | 5 | 13 | 18 | Mar 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6 | 11 | 17 | Aug 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 4 | 13 | 17 | Jul 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 6 | 8 | 14 | Aug 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 2 | 12 | 14 | Oct 25, 2015 | H2H |