H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Angelique Kerber vs Na Li H2H: 1-7

Na Li holds a 7–1 lead over Angelique Kerber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 5–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 Cincinnati fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelique Kerber
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 7
8 main draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2013* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Na Li #5 6-4 6-4 Angelique Kerber #8 Match data
Oct 22, 2012 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Na Li #8 6-4 6-3 Angelique Kerber #5 Match data
Aug 19, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 F Hard Na Li #9 1-6 6-3 6-1 Angelique Kerber #7 Match data
May 11, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Na Li #8 7-5 6-4 Angelique Kerber #14 Match data
Mar 10, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Angelique Kerber #19 6-4 6-2 Na Li #8 Match data
Oct 8, 2010* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Na Li #15 6-2 6-0 Angelique Kerber #58 Match data
Aug 7, 2010* Copenhagen WTA 250 QF Hard Na Li #11 6-1 6-2 Angelique Kerber #53 Match data
Jun 11, 2010* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Na Li #11 4-6 6-3 7-5 Angelique Kerber #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Angelique Kerber #205 #1 9,080 2,045 461 270 63.1% 3 0 0 10 1 14
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelique Kerber Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 1–1 50.0% #172 1,515 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2007 6–10 37.5% #88 1,548 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2008 7–14 33.3% #100 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 3–6 33.3% #117 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 23–19 54.8% #46 1,668 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2011 17–20 45.9% #32 1,675 0 0 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2012 57–20 74.0% #5 1,983 0 2 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2013 45–22 67.2% #9 1,947 0 3 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2014 43–22 66.2% #9 1,895 0 3 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2015 51–22 69.9% #10 1,917 0 7 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2016 54–16 77.1% #1 2,024 2 10 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2017 28–23 54.9% #21 1,767 2 10 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2018 43–16 72.9% #2 1,924 3 12 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2019 28–19 59.6% #20 1,800 3 12 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2020 7–6 53.8% #25 1,764 3 12 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
33 2021 29–15 65.9% #16 1,933 3 13 — — — — — — —
34 2022 13–9 59.1% #104 1,878 3 14 — — — — — — —
36 2024 6–10 37.5% #205 1,788 3 14 — — — — — — —