H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Anhelina Kalinina vs Beatriz Haddad Maia H2H: 2-0
Anhelina Kalinina holds a 2–0 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anhelina Kalinina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anhelina Kalinina won the 2023 Rome quarterfinal 6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 29
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Anhelina Kalinina | 6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-3 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2022* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anhelina Kalinina | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anhelina Kalinina | #59 | #25 | 1,677 | 1,901 | 96 | 106 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anhelina Kalinina | Beatriz Haddad Maia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,827 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #55 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #127 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 |