Ann Li
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | 4 | 2 | 6 | Aug 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Timofeeva | 4 | 0 | 4 | Aug 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 4 | 0 | 4 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 18, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Ann Li vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 0-1
Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 3-6 2-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 3-6 2-3 (ret.) | Ann Li | Match data | May 24, 2022* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | #28 | #28 | 1,683 | 1,844 | 95 | 85 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,772 | 123 | 149 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Li | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #47 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #129 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #169 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #96 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #38 | 1,816 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2026 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,772 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,609 | 0 | 5 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ann Li | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2020 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 2021 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2015 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2022 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2016 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2023 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2024 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2019 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2020 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 68 | 59 | 127 | 53.5% | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | 85 | 90 | 175 | 48.6% | 22 | 34 | 56 | 39.3% | 16 | 25 | 41 | 39.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 165/181 of Ann Li's and 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Ann Li | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3/3 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 61.8% | 66.5% | 34.7% | 49.3% | 52.4% | 54.4% | 42.3% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 59.4% | 63.4% | 49.6% | 61.1% | 31.4% | 57.9% | 37.7% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4/4 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 60.5% | 56.2% | 32.9% | 46.0% | 48.3% | 50.4% | 41.2% |
| 20 | 2020 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 65.4% | 60.3% | 45.8% | 47.0% | 36.5% | 55.3% | 40.2% | 2014 | 27/27 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 63.0% | 51.0% | 51.3% | 46.0% | 58.1% | 40.9% |
| 21 | 2021 | 29/29 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 60.3% | 63.9% | 50.2% | 57.1% | 48.1% | 58.7% | 47.0% | 2015 | 23/37 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 58.9% | 64.4% | 48.6% | 53.1% | 49.1% | 57.9% | 36.7% |
| 22 | 2022 | 25/27 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 60.9% | 61.1% | 44.6% | 53.2% | 42.5% | 54.5% | 40.9% | 2016 | 17/17 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 56.8% | 67.4% | 44.6% | 54.9% | 47.7% | 57.8% | 38.5% |
| 23 | 2023 | 5/5 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 54.4% | 63.4% | 45.2% | 51.9% | 43.3% | 54.6% | 37.0% | 2017 | 14/17 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 55.4% | 69.1% | 53.4% | 64.4% | 41.5% | 62.4% | 41.1% |
| 24 | 2024 | 12/12 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 66.0% | 65.9% | 44.5% | 51.4% | 45.0% | 58.5% | 47.5% | 2018 | 39/41 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 62.4% | 65.5% | 48.1% | 61.6% | 44.8% | 59.2% | 42.5% |
| 25 | 2025 | 42/54 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 58.4% | 66.4% | 48.0% | 50.5% | 45.8% | 58.6% | 44.4% | 2019 | 42/42 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 64.8% | 63.0% | 47.3% | 55.8% | 46.2% | 57.4% | 44.5% |
| 26 | 2026 | 45/47 | 4.8 | 2.8 | 58.5% | 67.8% | 45.0% | 57.2% | 47.2% | 58.4% | 42.0% | 2020 | 18/18 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 62.3% | 66.6% | 46.1% | 47.0% | 40.8% | 58.7% | 41.1% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 27/30 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 60.0% | 63.1% | 45.0% | 54.3% | 52.1% | 56.0% | 44.7% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22/22 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 58.2% | 64.6% | 48.0% | 60.7% | 42.8% | 57.8% | 43.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7/7 | 4.9 | 2.1 | 60.8% | 65.7% | 40.3% | 59.0% | 60.3% | 55.8% | 40.6% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 61.9% | 50.4% | 34.4% | 43.3% | 51.0% | 44.3% | 40.5% |
| Career | — | 165/181 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 59.9% | 65.2% | 46.6% | 53.8% | 45.6% | 57.7% | 43.5% | — | 250/272 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 60.8% | 64.4% | 47.1% | 55.7% | 46.4% | 57.7% | 41.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ann Li | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1511 | 108.0 | -2.51 | -2.37 | 0.928 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.43 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.15 |
| 18 | 2018 | 1511 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1555 | 103.7 | +2.11 | -1.71 | 0.894 | 47.9% | — | +51 | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1527 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1524 | 90.5 | -1.68 | -1.92 | 0.831 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.13 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1613 | 127.7 | -1.21 | -0.60 | 0.898 | 47.9% | +17 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.13 | 2014 | 1526 | 113.6 | +1.00 | -2.70 | 0.975 | 49.4% | -8 | +12 | +42 | 43.3% | -0.03 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–6 (14%) | 92.5 | +0.20 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1755 | 141.4 | +1.81 | +2.79 | 1.138 | 52.9% | +27 | — | -163 | 62.5% | +0.88 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 102.3 | +0.04 | 2015 | 1647 | 123.7 | +0.26 | -3.01 | 0.870 | 47.5% | -6 | -88 | -87 | 50.6% | -0.10 | 7–4 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 106.0 | +0.57 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1667 | 126.3 | -1.81 | -0.68 | 0.898 | 48.0% | +42 | — | -81 | 42.6% | -0.41 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–6 (25%) | 97.9 | -1.14 | 2016 | 1517 | 106.5 | +0.03 | -3.82 | 0.912 | 48.2% | +32 | — | -45 | 36.6% | -0.90 | 0–7 (0%) | 3–3 (50%) | 92.1 | +0.27 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 123.4 | -0.74 | -1.07 | 0.814 | 46.1% | +18 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.31 | 2017 | 1634 | 121.0 | +2.65 | -1.27 | 1.095 | 51.6% | +11 | -34 | — | 55.3% | +0.42 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.5 | +0.26 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1706 | 123.8 | +0.97 | +1.36 | 1.145 | 52.8% | -63 | +90 | — | 53.6% | +0.72 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–1 | — | +0.29 | 2018 | 1661 | 129.7 | +1.86 | -0.17 | 1.042 | 50.6% | -23 | -93 | -60 | 46.9% | +0.15 | 8–8 (50%) | 4–10 (29%) | 97.5 | -1.03 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1817 | 139.2 | +1.60 | +0.86 | 1.071 | 51.3% | -21 | -53 | -232 | 55.6% | +0.32 | 9–9 (50%) | 9–7 (56%) | 102.2 | -1.29 | 2019 | 1736 | 130.4 | +0.69 | +0.82 | 1.044 | 50.9% | -1 | -93 | -105 | 55.9% | +0.33 | 9–4 (69%) | 4–1 (80%) | 107.5 | +0.05 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1792 | 142.7 | +1.18 | -0.52 | 1.008 | 50.2% | -16 | +23 | -173 | 49.1% | +0.06 | 12–10 (55%) | 7–8 (47%) | 102.5 | +1.68 | 2020 | 1674 | 126.9 | +0.77 | -1.27 | 0.995 | 49.6% | +24 | -57 | — | 46.3% | -0.07 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–4 (33%) | 96.2 | +0.13 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1772 | 134.7 | -0.09 | +1.01 | 1.015 | 50.6% | +34 | -271 | -124 | 51.5% | +0.36 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.37 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1685 | 128.7 | +0.29 | +0.04 | 1.018 | 50.4% | -5 | — | +57 | 50.0% | +0.19 | 0–8 (0%) | 2–6 (25%) | 86.9 | +0.23 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1687 | 120.1 | -1.26 | +0.60 | 0.919 | 48.7% | -9 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.39 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.6 | -0.67 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1609 | 96.6 | -3.25 | -1.92 | 0.727 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 11.1% | -2.89 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.23 |
| Career | — | 1845 | 141.5 | +0.77 | +0.51 | 1.027 | 50.6% | -1 | -2 | -150 | 51.4% | +0.17 | 35–29 (55%) | 26–24 (52%) | 106.2 | -0.34 | — | 1772 | 129.8 | +0.64 | -0.86 | 0.987 | 49.7% | +4 | -70 | -50 | 48.1% | -0.02 | 39–53 (42%) | 28–44 (39%) | 92.0 | +0.02 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Alison Van Uytvanck
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 29, 2021 | H2H |
| Polona Hercog | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 25, 2020 | H2H |
| Kirsten Flipkens | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 2, 2021 | H2H |