H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 0-2
Ksenia Pervak holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ksenia Pervak leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ksenia Pervak won the 2011 Brisbane third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2011* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ksenia Pervak | 6-2 6-2 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2010* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ksenia Pervak | 6-2 6-3 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |